|
It's WAY safer to have FACEBOOK! Wikipedia has a bunch of 18+ stuff (Even stuff that don't relate to 18+ stuff..HAS 18+ STUFF IN IT!) I mean really why even think about allowing it? You guys put in youtube and twitter.....and that has like "Cyber Bullyers and foul words everywhere" but is still safter then 18+peida... |
|
|
And facebook is just plain BAD!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
OP
1. Chill out with the caps and exclamation points
2. Wikipedia tries to be factual, despite the fact anyone can edit it, but they're usually pretty good about getting the BS out
3. Facebook isn't THAT bad. I've had my account for almost 2 days in September, and haven't seen THAT much 18+ content, and when I did see it, I was looking for it out of boredom. You're just looking for "inappropriate" things |
|
|
Wikipedia is monitored pretty heavily.
Try vandalizing an article, and come back 10 minutes later. They're better than you think at stopping it.
I don't see why you're so against the idea. Over 95% of the articles are harmless, and most are just small villages in Europe.
So what if it doesn't have a report button? The intent is for people to learn. The people who edit it are for the most part benevolent, and Wikipedia has safeguards in place to mitigate the effects of the people who aren't.
YouTube is 10x worse than Wikipedia. The comments on any video are unfiltered and can be nasty and mean. Even if there IS a report button, YouTube has much looser guidelines than Roblox. What's appropriate for YouTube may not be for Roblox.
Besides, the name of the article is in the link. If it's really that bad, it will get filtered.
Wikipedia will help people learn. It's no worse than YouTube, and there is nothing wrong with allowing it. |
|
|
@NubwholikesWikipedia
I mean access
Youtube is safer because they have this thing where if it's mature they will put a little mature think or put a age login thing (Don't ask) and yea has a report button to
BUT
wikipedia is just UGH
check up "Human" on wikipedia..."Shivers" |
|
|
YouTube can be under 18 and still not appropriate for Roblox. It can't be reported on YouTube, because it's appropriate.
Wikipedia is fine. Click "random article" and 199/200 times it will be perfectly fine
What are you even thinking of as being bad on Wikipedia? Give me an example. |
|
|
@Branny
Wow.
You're really immature. That diagram of the male and female? It's scientific and for research purposes, have to be pretty desperate to try and get hot from that |
|
|
Do you mean the real wiki links or the Roblox wiki links? |
|
|
@Acc
I have to say...EVEN death is safer then wiki18+ia
YOUTUBE DOES have a report button...wikipiedia is just plain gross
@Popular
Wikipedia!
|
|
|
@marblemaster
There are more things.....which i'm not saying..... |
|
|
@branny
Are you five? That's historical photos you're claiming are "inappropriate"
So you want to censor history now? |
|
|
@Marble
No NOT history
God you fail..... |
|
|
"No NOT history
God you fail"
1. Then what's so "inappropriate" about it? Nothing. You're literally the only one flipping about this
2. I'm an Atheist. Leave religion out of this. |
|
|
Branny, calm down.
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
|
and Facebook doesn't have 18+ stuff? Even Youtube has 18+ stuff, if they allow wikipedia links it won't make a difference, Youtube has a lot of innopropiate things and ROBLOX allows it. |
|
|
and by the way your going to see innopropiate things, its part of life so suck it up and deal with it. |
|
ZebraPloxJoin Date: 2012-06-13
Post Count: 2925 |
This kid makes me want to smash my head into bits. |
|
|
check up "Human" on wikipedia..."Shivers"
Grow up seriously there is nothing wrong about that, how old are you? 9, 10 years old? So when yourself naked you call yourself eww? also are you into guys? |
|
UnicationJoin Date: 2013-03-29
Post Count: 5896 |
Social Network does NOT belong on ROBLOX. Therefore, people can be exposed to NSFW content numerous times which may result the whole ROBLOX domain to have a chance to be shutdown. |
|