of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

watevs44
#104761197Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:48 PM GMT

Would you users be open to the idea of being able to reward group personnel with Robux/Tix? Say for example, you hold a contest then the winner could receive a rank up and 50 Tix from the Group Funds. I thought it might be a nice way to give the group funds more purpose. Post your thoughts. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
XenonLi
#104761494Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:51 PM GMT

Is not a good idea, as corrupt users could give themselves/(specific)others all of the money. No support
watevs44
#104762112Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:55 PM GMT

"Is not a good idea, as corrupt users could give themselves/(specific)others all of the money. Thank you Tery215 for giving feedback however I do not feel that "corrupt users" is a valid reason to not permit this. I could easily argue that exiling powers should be removed because 'corrupt users could easily unleash admin attacks' as they have in the past. I know it sounds stupid but in this case it's true, "with great power comes great responsibility". With EVERY admin power that an owner gives out, there is the risk that there will be abusers. And owners learn to trust and learn to be careful with whom they lend their power to. As I said earlier, "abuseable" is not a valid reason because we have A LOT of abusable powers *already* (power to exile, delete comments, etc).
Espithel
#104763251Tuesday, July 09, 2013 4:05 PM GMT

Sure. Support. Although even more ways to apply group money would be nice.
watevs44
#104782609Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:37 PM GMT

When I revise this idea after receiving adequate feedback, I could include other group funds solutions as well.
MikkelDude
#104783245Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:42 PM GMT

Limitations as to how much robux/tix you can reward and how many times you can reward in a certain time frame would prevent users from abusing this privilege. I like the idea. "Payment" may be more appropriate seeming that this could be used for purposes such as working wages.
Bendike
#104783343Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:43 PM GMT

User made contest are not allowed.
Bendike
#104783442Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:44 PM GMT

I do like the idea.
watevs44
#104783585Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:45 PM GMT

MIkkelDude, We could also perhaps prevent a person from paying others in the same rank. That could prevent the "You scratch by back, I scratch yours" scenario. Thanks for the feedback.
MikkelDude
#104783649Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:46 PM GMT

"... promotions offering prizes of any sort (including contests, raffles, lotteries, chain letters or any kind of giveaway) ..."
MikkelDude
#104783727Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:46 PM GMT

My previous post was a don't-rule in the TAC.
watevs44
#104783941Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:48 PM GMT

Bendike, Group leaders and members are very much allowed to create intra and inter group contest. I made no mention of an official ROBLOX comtest.
DaltonDJWilliams
#104784242Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:50 PM GMT

A little scenario, cooldude215 (owner of [UK] United Kingdom) gets haxed, CD cant get his account back so the haxer wants money, he can go to [UK] United Kingdom and tells people to buy the donation stuff, they buy it and with all the other money on there will equal a lot. Once the haxer thinks that enough money has been accumalated he then transfers all the groups funds to himself. He then exiles all the members who complain and then the crime is commited without a trace.
watevs44
#104784367Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:51 PM GMT

MikkelDude, The S&I Forumers Crew Awards is not against the "TAC". And it is an example of the type of event where tix/robux could be awarded. Also, not all contests are promotional.
watevs44
#104784580Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:53 PM GMT

noisy, Really? That's what you're going to try and combat my thread with? I'm sorry but get serious. Honestly...
DaltonDJWilliams
#104791122Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:43 PM GMT

So you are saying that not one person in the entire community of ROBLOX would take the group funds if they could.
watevs44
#104911375Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:32 PM GMT

Noisy, But they can't so no point dwelling over a ferociously outrageously far fetched hypothetical.
DaltonDJWilliams
#105681351Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:33 PM GMT

You think that you are so cool because you use large words, it actually makes you look silly. People can make an alt, give the alt the money and sell a shirt and buy with all the funds.
Gavinski37
#105681482Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:34 PM GMT

why not? xD
trajing
#105681752Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:36 PM GMT

Noisy, why don't you find an argument that you can win?
Aerofall
#105681881Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:37 PM GMT

No support. This is just another way for people to get more Robux/Tix. ~Unless life also gives you water and sugar, your lemonade is gonna be bad~
trajing
#105681885Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:37 PM GMT

37, that's sort of spam.
DaltonDJWilliams
#106063791Friday, July 19, 2013 5:41 PM GMT

You make me laugh! The original post just wants this so he can go to abandoned groups, claim them and take the money.
watevs44
#107077863Friday, July 26, 2013 4:38 PM GMT

Oh, I forgot about this thread. Well, might as well bring it back to life while rebutting the plebeians. -=- Bridging, "No support. This is just another way for people to get more Robux/Tix." 1. It also gives the group funds more purpose 2. What's wrong with that? !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
watevs44
#107078866Friday, July 26, 2013 4:46 PM GMT

Noisy, "You think that you are so cool because you use large words," I'm sorry if you feel intimidated by my vocabulary. I can assure you however, I don't use big words to 'be cool'. I use big words because I'm intelligent enough where 'little words' are insufficient and inadequate -=-. "it actually makes you look silly." Please, don't impose your unwarranted irrational opinions on the rest of the ROBLOXians. *You* (not everyone) think I look silly because you can't mirror my vocabulary and that upsets/intimates you. -=- "People can make an alt, give the alt the money and sell a shirt and buy with all the funds." The "abuse" card won't fly here because everything is abusable when it comes to group admin powers. Not to mention the aforementioned restrictions that can and will be put in place to make the idea less abusable *and* less harmful. Read MikkelDude's post for such an example of restrictions. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right