JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
Migh be useless update, but hear me out.
I was thinking that we should have the option to lock maximum two hats to our bodies so that even if we die or press =, it will still stay on our head or body.
That way if you're wearing a hair hat or hair combination it'll stay on your head, making it seem like actual hair.
The reason it's two max is so you can still pick up one hat to wear on your head.
It won't cause anymore lag because it only regards hats that are already in the game, no more are being put into circulation.
Support? |
|
DonutlovaJoin Date: 2012-05-08
Post Count: 5340 |
what is the point of this? |
|
IgnotisJoin Date: 2013-05-04
Post Count: 3425 |
Support. |
|
flammaJoin Date: 2009-06-21
Post Count: 2742 |
bad and stupid idea |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
I thought it would add a bit of realism to the game (which I know people don't care too much about, but still) if you could lock hats like hair to your head so they actually seem like hair.
I warned it might be a useless post. But it wouldn't hurt the game. |
|
|
Your face is a bad and stupid idea.
I support this.
~Doodle doo. |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
Bump. |
|
|
I like it. It seems like a fine idea. Support. |
|
|
They already have this..
On some games, that is. |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
I meant more like it being an official thing so it would be there anywhere you go. |
|
Ps2damonJoin Date: 2009-08-23
Post Count: 257 |
This is useless... |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
I know it's considered useless to some people, but the scale of this if it were an update would be so small, that they could add this at the same time as another update.
It's only useless to people who don't wear those kinds of hats. On the other hand a lot of people do and they definitely wouldn't mind this, especially since it can be easily added and won't contradict anything. It's so small that it can't really be flawed.
It's a suggestion on a tiny scale, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't benefit people. |
|
|
I'm confused, but I will still try and post.
Why two when you can have three? I thought the whole point of = is to drop your hats. But sure, keeping your hats on when you die makes sense.
I'm pretty sure I'm wrong...
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
Oh. It's so you can drop at least one hat and wear another dropped hat. I said this because the hat limit is 3, but I guess now that I think of it it doesn't really matter in-game.
I just thought since this would be an official update they would try to enforce the hat limit is all. |
|
|
Why would you want to have a "Hat Lock" in the first place? |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
Errrrr for the reason I put in my OP? :l |
|
hatfat121Join Date: 2010-01-10
Post Count: 5266 |
yeah your right useless update waste of time |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
It may be useless but it's a small update which could be put in with a larger update.
It seems useless because it's on such a small scale.
Bumpin'. |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
I kind of feel like necrobumping :P |
|
RyuzojiJoin Date: 2015-12-21
Post Count: 937 |
game.Players.PlayerAdded:connect(function(Player)
Player.CharacterAppearanceLoaded:connect(function(Character)
for _, Object in pairs(Character:GetChildren()) do
if Object.ClassName == "Hat" then
Object.Handle.Name = Object.Name
Object[Object.Name].Parent = Character
local HatWeld = Instance.new("Weld")
HatWeld.Part0 = Character.Head
HatWeld.Part1 = Character[Object.Name]
HatWeld.Parent = Character[Object.Name]
Object:Destroy()
end
end
end)
end) |
|
AxFxJoin Date: 2009-08-14
Post Count: 518 |
Would be useless and annoying to game creators who want you to be "in character" by forcing you to wear other hats/clothing to fit into the game.
Basically this is every advanced game creator's worst nightmare.
|
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
^^ I didn't necessarily mean they were impossible for you to remove from your head.
This would only affect you when you press = or when you die.
You could still make a script that removes all hats from their head regardless of hatlock before making them wear other hats. If they're advanced game creators, that shouldn't be hard at all (it would actually be just like normal).
I wouldn't call it useless, as that implies aesthetic updates are useless, which I'm sure we all know isn't true.
ROBLOX makes many hats that are technically supposed to be a part of your body, like wings, horns, hair, facial hair, tails, etc. I also suggested this so you could still be wearing two hats even if you pressed = (because you can still pick up one more hat).
And when I was thinking about this, I really wanted it to be a feature that you bring into places, not that you script into places, because that kind of defeats the point of what I was trying to do.
But, yeah, it's fine to disagree. |
|
|
people can script this into the game if they want to this is not needed
~LoopholeHacker R$0 Tix31 |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
It's already been said. It's getting redundant now.
It's an update to aesthetics, which is why it's "unneeded," but ROBLOX didn't "need" to update ROBLOX past 2010.
And I already said that if it isn't brought into places it defeats the point of the suggestion. I wasn't suggesting that this be a place's feature. |
|
JaschaJoin Date: 2009-06-19
Post Count: 1447 |
Eh. I might regret this, but..... bump.
My bumpcromancy is strong. |
|