|
Ever posted a good thread but mods ignore.
Ever wanted intern mods to help with S&I
I have a solution! Do we bring intern mods back? NO! So we waste mods time searching through piles of junk for that gem? NO!
We introduce the S&I searchers system, which uses 3 methods to find those gems.
First of all, if they accepte they close the thread, make it a sticky, and say [TBC] (title here) and TBC means to be confirmed, then C and then they'll add it.
Method #1: The searcher post count
Mods get a notification when a S&I thread gets 5 pages, then review the idea. If accepted they close the thread, make it a sticky, and say [TBC] (title here) and TBC means to be confirmed, then C and then they'll add it.
Method #2: S&I searchers
Basically, people who are active S&I users are appointed by mods to use a direct pipeline when they find a good idea, the mod then reviews and makes TBC or not. If power abused to spam, they lose it.
Method #3: Thumbs up or thumbs down?
Like games, S&I threads can have up or down. When a thread hits 200+ ups and has less than 20 downs a notification is sent to a moderator.
Support or not? And any more ideas a.
|
|
|
#1 Yes
#2 WNTS
#3 Yes.
Good day sir. |
|
brett1337Join Date: 2010-06-18
Post Count: 6240 |
no support
there is nothing to say the admins will listen to the threads anyway
people who quote themselves are idiots-brett1337 |
|
|
@Above
Thanks, but two isn't a WNTS due to it not being intern mods. They hold NO power at all, but only a pipe line to one! |
|
mndvoskJoin Date: 2013-07-28
Post Count: 93 |
@ISeeYourPost
They aren't really moderators, merely those appointed by moderators to bring ideas to attention of the forum and the moderators. Even then, we would need strict prerequisites for them, such as an age requirement. |
|
|
@above
An age requirement like 13+, they only have a pipeline to mods. |
|
|
Ooh okay. Then all support. |
|
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
#1 and 3# the only threads that get 5 posts are both spammy ones and/or pathetic petitions. The only threads that will be realistically liked up to 200 likes are both spammy ones and/or pathetic petitions.
As for searchers... well, I've suggested empowerment to players before, so I do trust the community. It's just...
Mweh.
Support number two. |
|
|
|
UlrondJoin Date: 2011-06-23
Post Count: 11962 |
Support. |
|
sassle12Join Date: 2009-09-26
Post Count: 2382 |
Few problems,
1# Spammers get noticed (actually a good thing)
2# They wouldn't pick people who get banned which is a shame, I get banned for stating my mind. To imbeciles.
3# I don't agree with the thumbs down thing but the thumbs up I do. Think about it if 20 people hate your thread but 300 people like it, those 20 don't count
Support with tweaks. +If this gets implemented I want to list the people that I know who SHOULD get the moderator thing.
-Frozengia
-Surfking
-Sassle12
(Just for starters)
I would like to be a moderator because I would post on more threads than mods do now, I would also be a little harsher but I can change. Frozengia takes time to write responses. Surfking is one of the most active S&Iers I know. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Yes, five pages. Thanks for correcting that.
But my point still stands.
I'm more active than Surf and you, sassle.
If anything, if you put me on that list, then I'd use the argument that I'm the oldest S&Ier around and the most experienced. I only take time to write responces because I think about them a lot.
Mweh.
Bump for the sake of it. |
|
|
Cav33Join Date: 2012-09-04
Post Count: 1375 |
Support, but the thumbs-up and thumbs-down condition should be in a percentage rate. |
|
|
|