MacSwiftJoin Date: 2011-08-08 Post Count: 2 |
I think some girls that play ROBLOX wants a package of a skirt combine with ROBLOXian 2.0. It will be name as Female ROBLOXian 2.0. It should cost around 25 Robux. It should be added skirt so that they can make skirt with the skirt template and sell them with good prices! Instead of shirts and pants, there's skirt! Thank you for reading this. |
|
daredmeJoin Date: 2008-12-02 Post Count: 3170 |
No support.
I would support, but this lacks loads of stuff
1. This is an kids game, girl bodies will also need to include.. parts.. that are highly inappropriate for ROBLOX,
2. This would also cause gender-war, ex: Girl: OMG! this isn't fair! boys get all these cool mage and battle armor but we girls get nothing! more bodies for girls! more more more! Which would lead in the boys trying to fight for their rights.
3. They would possibly need to make an girl-version of every package in ROBLOX that is not an RPish body, like samurai or korblox.
But, this could work out if 1,2 and 3 didn't have to qualify.
Don't take this in offense, i'm mostly supportive with ideas.
But it just lacks.
alot. |
|
BulbosoreJoin Date: 2013-10-31 Post Count: 1175 |
why do you like robloxian 2.0 so much.
it looks hideous |
|
|
No support.
Girls can wear those armo(u)r packages, too. |
|
FatalWingJoin Date: 2011-08-25 Post Count: 1913 |
Why do you care bulb? |
|
AznIsBackJoin Date: 2006-07-23 Post Count: 19111 |
There is already a girl package though on roblox. |
|
|
^ Only a few, she means she wants more, MOAR PACKAGED THE ODERS WOOO.
But in all seriousness I hate all packages.
'Nuff Said |
|
maxjellyJoin Date: 2013-05-18 Post Count: 8344 |
1.0 is the best. |
|
|
lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno lolno |
|
Your8MomJoin Date: 2013-06-24 Post Count: 2792 |
No way.
Team 1.0 ftw!
~If anything can go wrong, it will~ |
|
re567Join Date: 2010-11-01 Post Count: 4550 |
No support.
It will just fuel Sexism, and it will fuel OD'ing. |
|
ChibtrioJoin Date: 2011-02-02 Post Count: 4103 |
Plus, most packages destroy the point of ROhuman... I mean ROBLOX! We aren't really "Blox" if we have human packages. :P |
|
|
|
|
|
. . .
I am tired of this "encurages ODing" thing, NOTHING encurages ODing, ODing makes you an ODer, not clothes...
Sorry for ranting, just had to get that off... |
|
|
|
VirtusIIJoin Date: 2011-01-25 Post Count: 988 |
I don't really care. I thought people where fine when 2.0 came out. Isn't it still the oding package? |
|
|
Virtu, that's the stereotype of it, me with my face completely covered by a mask, and i have 2.0 to make my shirt/pants look better, So am i automatically an ODer if i got 2.0? Obviously not.
It's like if you went "Everyone who has Robloxian 2.0 is an idiot" So this means if someone has 1.0 for a year, and then wears 2.0 the next year, they're an idiot? I don't think so.
Oh i could go on and on about stereotyping... |
|
|
I don't know. This would fuel sexism, as someone said back there.
Also, TEAM 1.0 FTW! |
|
|
IamawesomJoin Date: 2011-07-23 Post Count: 1346 |
2.0 isn't 100% ODing, it just encourages it with 3.0. |
|
IamawesomJoin Date: 2011-07-23 Post Count: 1346 |
No support |
|
|
stealthfreddy is right. you can't automatically call someone a oder bc of what clothes or package they wear. stereotypes much |
|