of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

OrcSlayer9
#14000687Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:57 PM GMT

and no you cannot say obama
Ryplayer
#14001735Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:35 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Ryplayer
#14001766Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:36 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Faltalis
#14002549Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:58 PM GMT

George Bush...hands down.
praja234
#14003328Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:20 PM GMT

Same
lukeinator2
#14004037Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:36 PM GMT

ROBLOX' DOWN WITH ROBLOX!
Happy0012
#14007877Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:59 PM GMT

George bush ZE WORST PREZ EVAAAAAAAAAAAAA dun dun dun Wait why did i put dun dun dun music in? O well
iplay
#14008771Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:21 PM GMT

Hitler, of course.
Hihibob
#14011330Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:18 PM GMT

Definately Hitler.
patsfan07Labs
#14012706Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:46 PM GMT

Well you shouldn't say a president that is only been out of office for 1 year. I would say Hitler.
banjo007
#14019863Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:20 AM GMT

Hitler, George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush, Thatcher, Nixon, Reagen and so on so forth.
eevee400
#14022861Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:58 AM GMT

Hitler wasnt a BAD leader, he was a good leader for his people and he was effective and effcient. He just wanted to do a very BAD thing, just beause he was evil and wanted to take over the world doent mean he was a bad leader, you guys, a bad leader is someone who isnt good at leading their people, Hilter was very good at leading his people, that he almost won the war, but then, Italy hanged their leader, Mousolini, and joined us then we won.
Wemmi0
#14024636Wednesday, September 09, 2009 12:10 PM GMT

Joseph Stalin..
banjo007
#14025053Wednesday, September 09, 2009 1:08 PM GMT

No, Joseph Stalin would have been a good leader if he hadn't been in such paranoia.
Wemmi0
#14025273Wednesday, September 09, 2009 1:34 PM GMT

'' No, Joseph Stalin would have been a good leader if he hadn't been in such paranoia. '' He did everything to gain more power. And he had ''death camps''(well they had to work untill they die) that were almost worse then Hitler's. Failed to invade Finlnd. Stalin wasn't a good leader. Due to the paranoia thing and some other :D.
Wemmi0
#14025932Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:14 PM GMT

Btw i now looked it up and it looks like staling killed about 60 million people O__o..
OrcSlayer9
#14026390Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:09 PM GMT

THAT WAS THE WHOLE WAR STupid
Dragomir
#14026420Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:12 PM GMT

If I have to choose who is stupid, it won't be Wemmi... It would be you Orc.
OrcSlayer9
#14026657Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:39 PM GMT

lol sorry i didnt now i had caps
eevee400
#14029960Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:42 PM GMT

It wont let me post.
eevee400
#14030100Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:45 PM GMT

I think Genral custer was the worst leader ever. He lead almost 1000 Americans to their death agaisnt almost 1000 native americans. They had guns and horses but the native americans only had spears. He was unorganised, no plans at all... Only around 40 native americans were killed and 160 injured, and almost all the americans died thanks to custers BAD leadership...
eevee400
#14030135Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:46 PM GMT

I couldnt think of a really bad leader from any other country....
OrcSlayer9
#14032081Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:25 PM GMT

i think it was more like 500
banjo007
#14053334Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:22 AM GMT

At least he didn't kill out of racial intolerance...
eevee400
#14054980Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:08 AM GMT

No, it was around 800/700 margin.

    of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right