of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

WannaBet
#145009035Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:17 PM GMT

vak doesn't need to 'extinguish void from existence' (whatever that means), void does a fine job destroying itself.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#145009069Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:18 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
darkwisp
#145009159Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:19 PM GMT

Damn that burn. But seriously, join The Collision
Drsniak
#145009164Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:19 PM GMT

"NFC"
WannaBet
#145009231Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:19 PM GMT

raa
contraptionist
#145009347Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:21 PM GMT

because vak got mad when void kept saying bad things about them since they declined their last war declaration "I rely on 9288605 to create my own signature."
WannaBet
#145009603Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:23 PM GMT

@92 that's respectively the same as picking a fight with an old man with osteoporosis not cool, vak.
GreenTomSawyer
#145009874Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:27 PM GMT

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO9OOOOOOOO
almightydelaney
#145009939Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:27 PM GMT

ow. i felt that burn.
Sankuu
#145009957Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:28 PM GMT

You could say the same thing about NFC. But VAK had a war with them either way, didn't they?
coolguy950
#145010066Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:29 PM GMT

apply cold water and call ems this sht's a third degree burn!
ClanNotGuilds
#145010094Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:29 PM GMT

/1NAwBRX
HateHouse
#145010284Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:31 PM GMT

And then we have a look at NFC LOL
WannaBet
#145010472Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:33 PM GMT

glock, as a renowned clan expert and an experienced nfc veteran, do tell us when my group had degraded itself to shutting down, 'revivals' or '2.0' shticks.
Sankuu
#145010810Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:37 PM GMT

"glock, as a renowned clan expert and an experienced nfc veteran, do tell us when my group had degraded itself to shutting down, 'revivals' or '2.0' shticks." glocktech, as a *self-proclaimed titles*, tell me when my group has degraded itself to shutting down, "revival", or a "2.0" Is that what you're asking me? ISO quit, that's why V O I D shut down. Now he has returned, and Hex isn't a 2.0, neither is it a revival. Yes, you could say that right now, V O I D is a revived clan, but you can't really call something dead because the leader quit once. It got back to life straight away when he returned, and re-created it. In the end, V O I D > NFC.
Lala_Deviluke
#145010913Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:38 PM GMT

o
Paracosm
#145011062Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:40 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
c4pt1nsm
#145011096Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:40 PM GMT

@Glock I thought this was about VOID v VAK Not VOID v NFC -ooooo-
WannaBet
#145012281Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:53 PM GMT

@glock the ceo of marlboro pleaded that cigs are 'not that bad for your health' on less instances than iso attempted to revive his theatrical group. you making up excuses and pretending to not know what i asked is a sham. and so i'm going to repeat myself and force an answer out of you. name me a single instance where nfc 'died', and back it up with tangible evidence. @par evaluating clans based on the groups mentioned by a retired nfc member on the forums proves that you are truly a shrewd thinker. good work.
almightydelaney
#145012393Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:54 PM GMT

nfc did better then most clans do in wars, what was the final score again? 7-14? 7-15? im queen
Sankuu
#145012715Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:58 PM GMT

Well WannaBet, FA5 stated it was dead before he got it, or on the boundary to death, or something like that. Except for that, I don't know much about NFC, because it isn't a very public clan, it's just there to be there, not to be useful. I just know that people who were previously in V O I D will keep rejoining it after shut downs, because V O I D is very similar to SC, in a way. Although V O I D has only had 1 shut down.
WannaBet
#145012884Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:00 PM GMT

lmao if you don't know crap about nfc why are you even getting yourselves involved by saying 'you could say the same thing about nfc'. shoo, bandwaggoner
nitroyoshi9
#145012887Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:00 PM GMT

LordVydrak
#145012908Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:00 PM GMT

we could apply your logic to NFC and it'd fit in even better VAK only warred NFC because they knew it wouldn't be a difficult war to win, same with RAT which is exactly why they were so flexible about war terms as well yet when it comes to clans like FC and VOID they're way too scared unless we allow they to pull the same BS +more like they did in the TGI war
Harbynger
#145012934Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:00 PM GMT

Gg. - Breekahn Vakaritus Brizon

    of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right