SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
Okay, I'm sure you all have this problem and know its gotta be fixed. When you type something in, "Cat" for example, you get things like "Blue Adidas Hood" or "Green dc with Gloves". About 75% of the time, I don't find what I'm looking for. And yes, somethings do come up for cat, but seriously, this needs to be a little more accurate. Shouldn't search results come up by name of item, I really don't like the whole tags idea. People can just add lots and lots of random tags just to get their item more popular.
So, should ROBLOX change, or how I say, "fix" the search?Or add a sort by option called, "Name". So when you search it brings up something actually related to your search.
I'll do two scenes to show you what I mean.
Scene 1 - Sort by:Relevance, you type in cat, you get "MUSCLE SHIRT 10K BUYS" and "NBA Jordan Jacket".
Scene 2 - Sort by:Name (or whatever), you type in cat, you get "Cat t-shirt", and "Business Cat".
Hopefully you guys agree with me, that ROBLOX should add some sort of better search engine option to find what your looking for ACCURATELY, if you support please say so, if not, tell me why and I'll be glad to reply. |
|
mipohJoin Date: 2012-01-27
Post Count: 150 |
This is absolutely true. I like the idea of the categories, rather than just changing all of it. Great thinking! |
|
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
bump |
|
AX94Join Date: 2011-08-09
Post Count: 7390 |
The issue is the people who post irrelevant tags in their items in hope to get more sales.
Honestly, that detracts me from buying anything from them. Ever. |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
Exactly, that's why ROBLOX should make a search based on the title of that item, not the tags. |
|
|
...? Why not both the tags AND title?
- Posted by a depressed, stupid, and strange 15 year old - |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
Well yes, but I think having a title based search would really get rid of the unnecessary items for that search. |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
(that's what the relevance search is for) |
|
|
Hm.... Maybe an option ticker thingy? Like click tags, or click title, or click them both?
- Posted by a depressed, stupid, and strange 15 year old - |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
Cool, I'm open for ideas, I just had the main part. |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
bump |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
bump2 |
|
|
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
@Boone, have you seriously posted 122k times? |
|
Devon1985Join Date: 2014-05-11
Post Count: 2204 |
supert |
|
wubby301Join Date: 2010-05-15
Post Count: 1907 |
Pros:
- Peoples will make too many tags, so this idea will filter.
Cons:
- Will break some tags (related to the title), useless. |
|
MossbirdJoin Date: 2012-07-29
Post Count: 7584 |
Support.
Tags shouldn't be allowed, though. |
|
|
I agree they should make the catalog user friendly especially for first timers and don't have to click as much just to get what you want. |
|
|
ik sometimes i search up big ballz and i get pictures of kayne west
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
SyrefJoin Date: 2012-06-24
Post Count: 1756 |
um ok thx for teh support guise |
|
|
Support, and ban people who put tags/delete the item |
|
|
support
...What, too soon? |
|
|
It's due to people putting in tags. |
|