of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

CarITheDragonBorn
#149346025Friday, November 07, 2014 11:07 PM GMT

we both know that's very impossible.
Aikai
#149346063Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

meh
Aegirine
#149346067Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

how so
TheRealMariowiiX
#149346080Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

yes, and race equality. even human equality. ~Marioluvswii 2008-2014 Add 4896 posts~
HelixDomo
#149346093Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

fuck yourself
Aikai
#149346095Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

here come the radfems and 12 year old girls from tumblr
davinhi1
#149346100Friday, November 07, 2014 11:08 PM GMT

No one is equal Blanket man, Blanket man. Livin' his life in a blanket, yeah.
CarITheDragonBorn
#149346116Friday, November 07, 2014 11:09 PM GMT

here come the radfems and 12 year old girls from tumblr that's the point.
AnonyAnonymous
#149346159Friday, November 07, 2014 11:09 PM GMT

Equality via abstraction is certainly possible to a limited extent. "Complete Equality" is certainly impossible though.
Aegirine
#149346202Friday, November 07, 2014 11:10 PM GMT

i'm perfectly willing to discuss your argument in a civilized manner so i dunno why you're still avoiding the question
Iamaniceperson
#149346288Friday, November 07, 2014 11:11 PM GMT

"how so" men will always have at least a little more dominance over women; that's never changing. I am a pretty dragon.
HygenistHygenist4
#149346319Friday, November 07, 2014 11:12 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Aegirine
#149346374Friday, November 07, 2014 11:13 PM GMT

'men will always have at least a little more dominance over women; that's never changing.' that's a pretty vague answer do you mean physically? mentally? socially? legally? emotionally?
Iamaniceperson
#149346556Friday, November 07, 2014 11:15 PM GMT

"that's a pretty vague answer do you mean physically? mentally? socially? legally? emotionally?" physically at least. men are biologically stronger and bigger than women generally. i'd say emotionally too, although men tend to react more with anger than sadness. I am a pretty dragon.
RealDwanyeJohnson
#149346608Friday, November 07, 2014 11:16 PM GMT

"that's a pretty vague answer do you mean physically? mentally? socially? legally? emotionally?" all Emos are idiots I RIP Realsteveaustin/arvin3149
HygenistHygenist4
#149346695Friday, November 07, 2014 11:17 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Aegirine
#149347049Friday, November 07, 2014 11:22 PM GMT

ok i'm still not sure about how much of a difference there really is but i won't bother arguing still that leaves both social and political issues where gender equality is possible but has not yet been achieved and tbh i don't see any reason why we shouldn't strive to achieve gender equality where possible rather than ignoring it based on differences in biology
Aikai
#149347105Friday, November 07, 2014 11:23 PM GMT

@dragon "political and social issues" such as
Iamaniceperson
#149347164Friday, November 07, 2014 11:24 PM GMT

"such as" unequal pay in SOME job fields and harassment. I am a pretty dragon.
kidfromtheschool
#149347210Friday, November 07, 2014 11:24 PM GMT

It is possible, if we try really hard. But you know how humanity is.
macykittie
#149347544Friday, November 07, 2014 11:29 PM GMT

here come the radfems and 12 year old girls from tumblr (2)
Dandaelion
#149348007Friday, November 07, 2014 11:36 PM GMT

Order is the only way for equality. Socialism ensures equality in economical class. I support socialism due to its ideals. Order tares down the walls of oppression to equal oppression.
tohuvabohu
#149348066Friday, November 07, 2014 11:37 PM GMT

I wonder how messed up or better the world would be if it was reversed. You're stinking up the subforum | I'm FlyingTacoz, I changed my username
Dandaelion
#149348113Friday, November 07, 2014 11:37 PM GMT

Socialism would be the dominating party and it wouldn't have corrupt leaders.
Aegirine
#149348117Friday, November 07, 2014 11:37 PM GMT

'such as' i'd say the one that i think is most misinterpreted is the wage gap which definitely exists but people say 'oh but women and men in the same position generally earn the same amount it's just that women generally take positions that pay less' whilst ignoring the fact that even in instances where gender doesn't really come into play there's a lot of employers that simply won't hire and/or promote people of different genders or religions or ethnicities there was a study where employers were asked if they would hire two different applicants based solely on a written application, except both applications were the same aside from the names - one was a masculine name, one was a feminine name - and as it turned out the application signed with a masculine name was accepted far more often than the one with the feminine name even if it's a case where the employer is saying 'we wouldn't want to make the employee feel alienated in a male (OR FEMALE) dominated environment' there's obviously still an issue i believe there is also a minor wage gap for similar positions in the first place but i won't touch on that for the moment and i mean there's a lot of other issues for all genders in all countries and all ethnicities and all classes but it would take me far too long to talk about all of them so i've just chosen this one in particular

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right