TheYuhManJoin Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901 |
This would be so useful instead of having to script turning wheels. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
I do not support, because I think that anything that can be scripted should not be added.
Roblox, when it comes to studio, is about learning to develop games, if they do everything for us, how are we ever going to move on to more advanced game dev engines like Unity or Unreal Engine?
And yes, 'no support' is allowed with a supplied explanation. |
|
|
^
^
^
^
^
that reply was so good, i couldn't resist but support it.
yes, i support it. not this silly idea.
SCRIPTABLE! |
|
TheYuhManJoin Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901 |
if you want "silly ideas", click on the ones that want NBCs to get daily robux. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
lmao I love those |
|
|
it's scriptable.
clearly, i never said that YOU had to script the wheels.
this thread is kinda pointless now, since y'know... |
|
|
"I do not support, because I think that anything that can be scripted should not be added.
Roblox, when it comes to studio, is about learning to develop games, if they do everything for us, how are we ever going to move on to more advanced game dev engines like Unity or Unreal Engine?"
simply saying "no support, ROBLOX isn't going to do everything for you" would of been much easier and wouldn't make you look egotistical and all like "im mature xd" |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
Egotistical? I was simply stating that users should learn to create things themselves, and I supplied a reply which was perfect for the situation. It was in no way meant to undermine anybody, nor was I stating that I am mature. |
|
|
"Egotistical? I was simply stating that users should learn to create things themselves, and I supplied a reply which was perfect for the situation. It was in no way meant to undermine anybody, nor was I stating that I am mature."
you can close your thesaurus now sweetie |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
Please don't randomly bash on people's posts...
Also, just because my grammar is near perfect doesn't mean I use dictionaries or thesauruses...
Oh, another thing. A thesaurus is mainly for Synonyms and Antonyms, I'd rather a dictionary to find the meaning of a word. (Although I already have an exceedingly large vocabulary, it's nice to learn new words) |
|
|
omg u must like be gifted or something...omg ur so much bettr den me!!1111 |
|
|
Excuse me?
"rack & pinion"
What is this. Just what is this.
WHAT IS THIS? |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
What's funny about this is the fact that you think I actually care about your opinion of me. I replied with an honest post and you seem to think you just MUST discredit it, even with no tangible proof.
"simply saying 'no support, ROBLOX isn't going to do everything for you' would of been much easier and wouldn't make you look egotistical and all like 'im mature xd'"
First, you say I should give a short response that is rude, which ROBLOX does NOT allow.
Second, you insult me for no reason, saying I replied with what I did because I am conceited, which makes no sense what-so-ever.
and Third, you continue to insult me even after I explain how it was an honest reply, and was in no way meant to be rude
Please do not deny any of this, it is obviously all true based upon the previous replies... |
|
|
I can't support this question if I don't find out what the what this is. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
Rack and Pinion allow a steering wheel to change the direction of multiple tires with less force |
|
|
Uh, does this mean better steering? Because if it does, I'm all for it. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
No, it means a certain type of steering.
In roblox, it would just allow the wheels to turn based on the direction the vehicle is turning. |
|
|
omg shut up im gifted therefore bettyr de nyou!11 |
|
|
Well, why the heck not?
Support I guess, it's optional. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
It can easily be scripted, which is what I was saying in my posts above.
This is why I do not support it. |
|
|
Just because something can be scripted (Like gravity for example) doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented officially. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
A good example of what I mean is in the WNTS
"• Add an AFK system so I stop getting killed. (Builders can make their own AFK systems.)"
If builders can make it, they are not adding it (Unless it is EXTREMELY hard to make, like pathfinding) |
|
TheYuhManJoin Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901 |
Woah, lots of replies...
What I want is not easily scriptable, the scripts people have made move and turn the wheels, while the rack & pinion system just changes where the wheels face.
I remember seeing an article in the blog where they made a functional excavator using some features that have yet to be implemented. |
|
SteamyMuJoin Date: 2012-04-09
Post Count: 1197 |
I saw those features and that blog post was about how they upgraded their joints system. If I were you, I'd learn to script and make my own Rack and Pinion anyway, it will allow it to be WAY more flexible. |
|
|
AFK is probably easier. But something like planet gravity is what should be implemented. |
|