|
BroBro264Join Date: 2011-07-12
Post Count: 28121 |
lol? try beating the best defense in the league with a third string qb. they are way better than this. |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
that they are playing their 3rd string QB?
yes we are aware of it |
|
|
no they're not
Iᴛ ᴀɪɴᴛ ᴇᴀsʏ, ʙᴇɪɴɢ Cʜᴇᴇsᴇʏ. |
|
|
|
Hard to win with a 3rd sting qb |
|
padam11Join Date: 2013-02-11
Post Count: 15774 |
truth? 11-3 with a 3rd string QB. that's the truth.
"Counting is paramount." |
|
|
|
|
Yea they were playing there 3rd sting qb against the best defense |
|
|
They've played half the season with a backup QB. Most of the games they barely win against mediocre teams. They finally play a good team and get destroyed. |
|
|
Except that they beat the Chargers, 49ers, Eagles, Cowboys, Lions, and Chiefs... |
|
|
A 3rd sting qb that known to suck vs the best defense hmm i wonder |
|
|
"Chargers". By 1 point in Week 1. Neither team is the same now, and SD may not make the Playoffs
"49ers" A sub-.500 team. Plues, that was Week 3. Again very early
"Eagles" A 4 point win over a non-Playoff team
"Cowboys" This was a good win
"Lions" By 8 points against a team that has also struggled to win convincingly
"Chiefs" Wow an 8-7 team by a field goal |
|
|
i agree with you the cardinals are extremely overrated
Iᴛ ᴀɪɴᴛ ᴇᴀsʏ, ʙᴇɪɴɢ Cʜᴇᴇsᴇʏ. |
|
|
Wow! Cheesey and I agree on something! |
|
|
Oh and Arizona ranks 16th in point differential |
|
|
Bc a 3rd sting qb should be able to beat the seahawks right |
|
|
It doesn't really make much of a difference because the offense has been mediocre at best all year. AND...
He should be able to at least get them 1 touchdown. AND...
Oh yeah, and the 3rd string QB doesn't excuse giving up 35 points at home |
|
|
""Chargers". By 1 point in Week 1. Neither team is the same now, and SD may not make the Playoffs"
SD is still a great team and who cares if it was by 1 point they still won
""Eagles" A 4 point win over a non-Playoff team"
The Eagles would be a playoff team if the NFC South didn't suck. who cares if it was by 4 points, they still won
""Lions" By 8 points against a team that has also struggled to win convincingly "
Man they only beat a playoff team by 8 points they must suck! Who cares if it was by 8 points, they still won
""Chiefs" Wow an 8-7 team by a field goal"
The chiefs are a good team and who cares if they only won by a field goal, they still won |
|
|
Its the seahawks once your behind game over |
|
|
Okay ext, that's not even my main point, so I'm not going to read that.
1. Arizona ranks 16th in point differential, outside of the top 12
2. Arizona average 18.3 ppg, clearly not a Super Bowl-contending number
3. Arizona has barely slid past teams that real contenders would whoop |
|
RomoismJoin Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 43090 |
so? seahawks lost to the rams, pats lost to the dolphins, upsets happen.... |
|
|
"1. Arizona ranks 16th in point differential, outside of the top 12"
So? Buffalo has a better point differential than Cincinnati and San Diego. They aren't better in any way or form.
"2. Arizona average 18.3 ppg, clearly not a Super Bowl-contending number"
look at what the average was before Palmer was hurt.
"3. Arizona has barely slid past teams that real contenders would whoop"
The patriots didn't whoop the jets I guess they aren't real contenders |
|
padam11Join Date: 2013-02-11
Post Count: 15774 |
btw they're still 11-4 so i don't see how they are showing their true colors when they have won even with their 3rd string QB and injuries on the defense
"Counting is paramount." |
|