of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153828627Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:57 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153829288Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:05 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
MatthewPWNZ
#153829839Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:12 AM GMT

I agree with the last one.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153830042Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:14 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Bavarium
#153830229Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:17 AM GMT

only support last one, 2 is just a joke, and 1 is just unfair
Tenako
#153830538Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:21 AM GMT

Support for 1 and 3
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153831934Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:37 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
kurtisss111
#153833441Tuesday, January 13, 2015 1:54 AM GMT

support, i liek bacon doe
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153864002Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:56 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
ForumTurret
#153864251Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:04 PM GMT

print [ 1.Support or 2.Support or 3.Support ] output: false
Ulrond
#153864930Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:26 PM GMT

Why would you not want people under 4 months? You're just losing players.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153864936Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:27 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
ForumTurret
#153866321Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:13 PM GMT

3 will never happen their dumb list is better than no chat at all
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153870268Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:46 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
XenonLi
#153870336Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:47 PM GMT

#1: scriptable #2: yay #3: yes
Unseendanger97
#153870682Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:53 PM GMT

Agree with 1 and 3. But they are both easily scriptable.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153924896Wednesday, January 14, 2015 6:07 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153978959Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:07 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
KapKing47
#153979671Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:32 PM GMT

o.O not interesting... and childish, no offense
golfgames1
#153979927Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:42 PM GMT

My response to number one: I believe this is able to be scripted? But, there are some new ROBLOX players. Not all the recently joined people are alts, surprisingly. My response to number two: This sounds like unnecessary scripting/developing. A users appearance is the least of ROBLOX's concerns. My response to number three: Completely logical. However, people can just make a new email account to verify their alts, it has been done before. Users under 13 should not be able to speak period, or even VIEW the chat in-game.
Henrygg9
#153981275Thursday, January 15, 2015 6:25 PM GMT

Support! All hair should be dyed pink, in my opinion
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153985044Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:15 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
HershB
#153985155Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:18 PM GMT

First of all, nice important sign when most of these were just something from a crazy ROBLOX addict's dream. Second of all, no support because this is all scriptable. Game developers can add this into their game via script they made or a (just like most new players use) free models.
chimmihc
#153985240Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:20 PM GMT

fyi i know how to do all three with a script
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#153988189Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:19 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right