of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

srgtkiller
#15407933Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:03 PM GMT

Like if peral harbor wasn't attacked
patsfan07Labs
#15408036Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:04 PM GMT

Well if the US never entered, the Axis would have won.
austi722
#15408357Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:12 PM GMT

I think well Rusia would have had to do most battles usa did if they entered the war well bascally the allies would do more battles and they would of had to fight japan
Thorae
#15408419Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:13 PM GMT

The Axis would of won. It was a joint effort. USA provided: Money Resources Soldiers Britain held out long enough for us to help them with France and Germany Soviet Union provided: Lots and lots of soldiers
austi722
#15408557Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:16 PM GMT

Yea and germany was almosted finished with there necular weapon
TheSquirrel
#15408680Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:19 PM GMT

Typical American to say that without their involvement, the Axis would have won.
austi722
#15408752Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:21 PM GMT

Yea but i think the soviet union might of been able to defeat germany without usa
TheSquirrel
#15408788Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:22 PM GMT

Indeed. We have a lot to thank the Soviets for.
son54
#15409159Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:29 PM GMT

They couldn't have done it without TONS of us supplys landing to them everyday.
TheSquirrel
#15409319Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:33 PM GMT

And we could have won it years earlier if soldiers had accompanied those supplies.
Thorae
#15409578Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:38 PM GMT

Can't you just be grateful we helped you? You would of lost if we didn't help. You would of lost if the Soviet Union didn't help. We would of lost if Britain didn't help. Why didn't you help us in the Pacific at all? Hmm? We should do it for you but you don't have to for us?
Thorae
#15409601Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:39 PM GMT

Sorry..Meant to say "would have". Common typo.
TheSquirrel
#15409958Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:47 PM GMT

Why didn't we help in the Pacific? 1) It's half way round the world from us. It would take months for our soldiersnto reach there. 2) Our aircraft and navy were occupied in the Battle of Britain and the Battle of the Atlantic. 3) We were kinda busy with the Germans. 4) Our Armed Forces simply weren't large enough to fight two wars.
austi722
#15410034Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:49 PM GMT

I heard soviet union fought 1 battle against japa after germany was defeated soviets fought japan the week they surrendered
TheSquirrel
#15410518Wednesday, October 14, 2009 10:59 PM GMT

That's correct, austi. Following the bombing of Hiroshima, Russia invaded Japanese-occupied Manchuria.
Hihibob
#15410641Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:02 PM GMT

If WWII wasn't in WWII than the Allies wouldn't have won. The Russians would have been to occpuied fighting the Germans so the Japanese could easily kill them and the Austrailians. The English would be forced to fight on multiple fronts and they wouldn't be successful.
Hihibob
#15410691Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:03 PM GMT

Sorry, I meant to say "If the USA wasn't in WWII..." and not "If the WWII wasn't in WWII..." XD
son54
#15410740Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:04 PM GMT

What ended the war WAS NOT THE INASION, OR THE BOMBS! America sent over 1,000 bombers over tokeyo(sorry for spelling) They were unloaded, but Japan though otherwise. Americans scared the hell out of them.
Hihibob
#15410779Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:05 PM GMT

The Svoiets could have defeated the Germans but they would have had to take A LOT MORE CASUALTIES. Then the Japanese would close in from behind and seal the USSR's fate.
TheSquirrel
#15410785Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:05 PM GMT

No, the Japanese could never attack Britain. Their planes would run out of fuel and their ships would take months to reach the island. Britain would remain fighting on one front.
son54
#15410831Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:06 PM GMT

Trust me, I have watched HOURS of this WW2 stuff. I probably know the most about these things. US didn't join WW2 for a while because they didn't want to give up their great life style! Everyone was rich and everyone had jobs. Would you give it up that easily?
son54
#15410903Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:07 PM GMT

TheSquirell, Briten was ALREADY fighting and many fronts. Singapore was one of them.
TheSquirrel
#15410975Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:09 PM GMT

Hihibob, the Soviets had very little help from the Americans actually, and they pushed the Germans back on the Eastern Front to Berlin.
son54
#15411076Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:10 PM GMT

-_- SOVIOTS WERE TOAST WITHOUT USA! They were about to be defeated and thats when the American bombers pack full of supplys came. They brought planes amo uniforms knifes food etc.....
TheSquirrel
#15411077Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:10 PM GMT

True, I had forgotten about Britain's campaigns to protect its Empire. But as for everyone living rich? Are you kidding? Does "The Great Drepression" ring any bells?

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right