of     1   

DarkImperiator
#158190594Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:35 PM GMT

This idea has been said before but If an owner leaves a group without giving the group to someone else, the next highest rank gains ownership. However he must already have BC.
NovusTheory
#158190737Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:40 PM GMT

No! :D
DarkImperiator
#158190782Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:41 PM GMT

"No!" Why not? Why don't you support?
NovusTheory
#158191089Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:50 PM GMT

First come, first serve
DarkImperiator
#158191123Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:51 PM GMT

"First come, first serve" So if an owner leaves a group, you don't want anyone to take his place?
NovusTheory
#158191192Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:53 PM GMT

Nope, Whoever clicks the own group button first. Get's the group.. If the owner really wanted someone else to take his place. He would transfer his ownership
DarkImperiator
#158191247Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:55 PM GMT

"Nope, Whoever clicks the own group button first. Get's the group.. If the owner really wanted someone else to take his place. He would transfer his ownership" You don't seem to understand. If he leaves the group because he doesn't like it, the next highest BC member should gain ownership.
NovusTheory
#158191277Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:56 PM GMT

First come, First serve. I completely understand.
DarkImperiator
#158191316Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:57 PM GMT

"First come, First serve. I completely understand.' You don't unserstand. Why should a group be left with no owner?
NovusTheory
#158191438Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:01 PM GMT

What if no members were in the group? No owner. Same difference. This is not needed anyways.
DarkImperiator
#158192555Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:33 PM GMT

"What if no members were in the group? No owner. Same difference. This is not needed anyways" He wouldn't leave a group like that. What dot you mean it is not needed? It is very needed.
froxxxxx
#158192621Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:35 PM GMT

first nbc to post on this thread lolo

    of     1