Bring back the old default face.

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161220023Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:26 PM GMT

If any mods are reading this, then check the commentary of the 'Smile' face.

TheYuhMan

Join Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901

#161221315Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:45 PM GMT

omfg SHUT UP!

Gabe163

Join Date: 2009-05-31
Post Count: 869

#161226738Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:09 PM GMT

@science Be nice. @doggy ROBLOX said, "No."

TheYuhMan

Join Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901

#161226898Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:11 PM GMT

@gabe I've seen about 27 of these threads so far

blockzbuilderz

Join Date: 2014-07-19
Post Count: 3951

#161227448Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:17 PM GMT

Agreeing with Science.

Robloxian2459

Join Date: 2014-07-26
Post Count: 3605

#161227827Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:22 PM GMT

Maybe as an option?

Blavk_Sphinx

Join Date: 2012-10-14
Post Count: 64

#161229569Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:48 PM GMT

I miss the old default face, this face looks like the nightmarish version of it.

Misopedia

Join Date: 2014-08-25
Post Count: 1768

#161229668Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:49 PM GMT

I miss it too. But I just say that some people like this face. But, others like the other. So just have both in catalog.

peacefulangelcat

Join Date: 2011-09-17
Post Count: 10480

#161232308Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:27 AM GMT

its better to just sell the old default face *wink wonk*

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161278866Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:23 PM GMT

@Science The more people, the more of a chance they'll bring it back. @peaceful It'd be better if they recovered the old default altogether, but selling it would be nice, too. Either way, just bring it back!

TheYuhMan

Join Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901

#161279128Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:26 PM GMT

@doggy Roblox staff themselves have said that they do not pay attention to petitions, and that they will not undo the face update

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161279902Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:36 PM GMT

@sci Then ROBLOX staff will regret it, because this will eventually help thousands of ROBLOX Users quit, along with all of the other useless updates. The more they quit, the less money ROBLOX will make because not as many people will be active on this website. The update was completely useless in the first place (No offense, ROBLOX). For one, no one even asked for a new default face. Two, before it even became the default face, people were still posting hate in its commentary. Either way, it IS an opinion whether the new default or old default is better, but at LEAST half of ROBLOX (all of the decent ones) agree with me when I say this update was not needed a bit.

TheYuhMan

Join Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901

#161280044Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:37 PM GMT

@doggy Well they won't really lose money, as most of the people who >may< quit are NBC

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161280120Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:38 PM GMT

Also, why would they say they don't pay attention to petitions? The whole forum itself is called 'Suggestions & Ideas'. Either you used the wrong word (Which I understand) or I forgot what a petition is.

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161280259Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:40 PM GMT

NBC'ers usually turn into BC'ers. In other words, ROBLOX is destroying their chance of possibly gaining money in the future.

TheYuhMan

Join Date: 2009-09-25
Post Count: 23901

#161280678Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:45 PM GMT

I know exactly what a petition is. Roblox staff ignore petitions because they are, when boiled down, pages upon pages of nothing but "SUPPORT" spam. It's called S&I because the staff expect players to post well-typed ideas and how they would work out. In fact, saying "Support" or "No support" is against the rules.

doggy00

Join Date: 2011-01-11
Post Count: 3571

#161281049Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:50 PM GMT

Interesting... Thanks for the info. Still, they should understand that they made a big mistake, and they made a bigger mistake by telling users they aren't changing it back.