Meanwhile at the UAF defense

Join Date: 2012-08-31
Post Count: 15658

#161513846Monday, May 04, 2015 1:16 AM GMT

why are you so cocky if you lose most of your defenses to SF and cant win at their base?

silentfox123

Join Date: 2010-06-28
Post Count: 3524

#161514015Monday, May 04, 2015 1:18 AM GMT

Jokes=cocky

Join Date: 2011-02-03
Post Count: 818

#161514683Monday, May 04, 2015 1:26 AM GMT

Ah yes, a wild Synoan appears!

l3asedGod

Join Date: 2010-07-03
Post Count: 203

#161514964Monday, May 04, 2015 1:30 AM GMT

Classic Synoan, sees a post involving UAF and has to get all about it.

Resurexx

Join Date: 2014-07-08
Post Count: 10459

#161515011Monday, May 04, 2015 1:31 AM GMT

http://prntscr.com/719su5

BelugianWhaleCop

Join Date: 2015-04-08
Post Count: 70

#161515280Monday, May 04, 2015 1:34 AM GMT

Son of a wuss stole my punchline!

SteveoDash

Join Date: 2012-12-26
Post Count: 14343

#161515470Monday, May 04, 2015 1:37 AM GMT

UAF just.......... no I can't flame them again man

Scorpiosis

Join Date: 2010-11-11
Post Count: 3039

#161515499Monday, May 04, 2015 1:37 AM GMT

We literally won a raid on SF a couple hours ago and we defend most of SF's raids successfully. So, argument invalid.

Join Date: 2011-02-03
Post Count: 818

#161515536Monday, May 04, 2015 1:38 AM GMT

Go ahead Stevo

Join Date: 2011-02-03
Post Count: 818

#161515597Monday, May 04, 2015 1:39 AM GMT

Synoan is just salty we went 2-0 on him and then he killed the war. RAA probably would have won too.

Join Date: 2013-03-02
Post Count: 351

#161516518Monday, May 04, 2015 1:51 AM GMT

We actually drive back SF in most defenses and we just recently had a successful win of our own. Considering RAA is inactive on its own and got 2-0'd you have no room to talk lol

Join Date: 2012-08-31
Post Count: 15658

#161516604Monday, May 04, 2015 1:52 AM GMT

kling i didnt kill the war UAF group banned us

mrtotempole

Join Date: 2009-03-21
Post Count: 2648

#161516680Monday, May 04, 2015 1:53 AM GMT

Glory.

Join Date: 2013-03-02
Post Count: 351

#161516694Monday, May 04, 2015 1:53 AM GMT

Hmm I wonder why Synoan?

Join Date: 2012-08-31
Post Count: 15658

#161516718Monday, May 04, 2015 1:53 AM GMT

because you lost 2 servers at coventry and got upset about the control points

Default_System

Join Date: 2011-03-30
Post Count: 4450

#161516750Monday, May 04, 2015 1:54 AM GMT

2-0 :)

Join Date: 2011-02-03
Post Count: 818

#161516817Monday, May 04, 2015 1:54 AM GMT

Maybe we group banned you because you did updates to your base during a war when the terms said "no updates to bases". Logic is hard to use sometimes I know but damn.

UrbanMidnightShades

Join Date: 2013-08-17
Post Count: 6498

#161516861Monday, May 04, 2015 1:55 AM GMT

Actually we were pretty happy go lucky with our 2-0 until you freaked out and closed your base. Hypocrite.

Join Date: 2012-08-31
Post Count: 15658

#161516862Monday, May 04, 2015 1:55 AM GMT

well kling the thing is i didnt update during the war we've already been over this lol

Join Date: 2013-03-02
Post Count: 351

#161516875Monday, May 04, 2015 1:55 AM GMT

No, because you couldn't come to a simple agreement about war terms so you and False decided to call it off like an idiot.

Join Date: 2012-08-31
Post Count: 15658

#161516915Monday, May 04, 2015 1:56 AM GMT

Actually we were pretty happy go lucky with our 2-0 until you freaked out and closed your base. ------------------------------ i never closed my base unless it literally didnt work you're lucky paul opened the beta of coventry 2 otherwise you wouldnt even have those 2 wins xD

Join Date: 2013-03-02
Post Count: 351

#161516981Monday, May 04, 2015 1:57 AM GMT

You're lucky 80% of SF is RAA lol