of     1   

lottery248
#162705165Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:33 PM GMT

recently, if you search the dedicated server, you will find that you can rent a dedicated server with even cheaper (in average) than expectations. in average, if roblox needs to pay ~2 dollars per player, there are server avaliable for ~1 dollar per player. unless roblox got the provable cheapest server, otherwise isn't roblox are tricking us to buy BC for nothing? there are no reason anymore to say the server is as expensive as roblox needs. roblox wished pay even less if they pay the money per about year, it would be even less to pay. so, roblox needs to move their own server to a better dedicated server, plus most of the extensions (security*, maintenance, space upgrades, data movement/backups) are dirt cheap. *as powerful as the top ones. if roblox could accept this, most of the expenditure would be decreased; so everyone wins (more likely). ok... seriously guys, if you disagree, can you give me some evidence to?
Creepcruncher
#162705465Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:39 PM GMT

"recently, if you search the dedicated server, you will find that you can rent a dedicated server with even cheaper (in average) than expectations." -Who said it'll be a good server though? "in average, if roblox needs to pay ~2 dollars per player, there are server avaliable for ~1 dollar per player. unless roblox got the provable cheapest server, otherwise isn't roblox are tricking us to buy BC for nothing?" -Again, it could be a terrible server, take wages and the actual ROBLOX HQ costs into account too. "there are no reason anymore to say the server is as expensive as roblox needs. roblox wished pay even less if they pay the money per about year, it would be even less to pay. so, roblox needs to move their own server to a better dedicated server, plus most of the extensions (security*, maintenance, space upgrades, data movement/backups) are dirt cheap. *as powerful as the top ones." -They're not dirt cheap unless they don't work. If ROBLOX could use cheaper servers that are lag free, thus increasing profit, they already would have. It's a company, they haven't got potato powered servers for a valid reason. "if roblox could accept this, most of the expenditure would be decreased; so everyone wins (more likely). ok... seriously guys, if you disagree, can you give me some evidence to?" -It might be cheaper, but then games would be unplayable due to lag from poorly maintained servers. Your call, either having optional BC or not having ROBLOX. Tom R. Toe || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qllXwbrKgXc
lottery248
#162705912Saturday, May 23, 2015 1:46 PM GMT

"-Who said it'll be a good server though?" was expensive. now, you are still believing that more expensive is better. "-Again, it could be a terrible server, take wages and the actual ROBLOX HQ costs into account too." poof! they could just test their server before buying it, plus there are some of the servers with reliable certs. "-They're not dirt cheap unless they don't work. If ROBLOX could use cheaper servers that are lag free, thus increasing profit, they already would have. It's a company, they haven't got potato powered servers for a valid reason." again, we didn't know the expenditure for that. we need that report, man. "-It might be cheaper, but then games would be unplayable due to lag from poorly maintained servers. Your call, either having optional BC or not having ROBLOX." not having roblox is even better than just buying BC. why? at least i knew how game works - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-LE0ycgkBQ (similar to this site).
Creepcruncher
#162707236Saturday, May 23, 2015 2:07 PM GMT

Oh, I see what you mean. You want BC to be removed. no Tom R. Toe || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qllXwbrKgXc
Semaphorism
#162707290Saturday, May 23, 2015 2:08 PM GMT

do you even linux bro?
lottery248
#162793781Sunday, May 24, 2015 8:09 AM GMT

i don't have linux. "You want BC to be removed. no" so you could be greedy as you want just because you bought BC.

    of     1