SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
I have heard a lot about Asterian Fleet and noticed that it is a quality group. When Salurian Royal Armada raided their fort it was clear how capable their members were at combat. We also had no issues with their behavior during the raid. I personally feel it's a great group and will only get better. Having said that I think it's only fair to point out the issues, with its fort that is. Put simply, I saw the fort as unfair. AF members had cover advantage at any stage of the fort, they also often had flank advantage. In order for us to outflank them we had to do wall obbies, they weren't hard but getting to them was. The fort is also too large and perhaps the guns should have a less hard to see reticle. The middle dot alone would be fine, but the surrounding detail confuses the shot. Now for the terminal, even though the raid was official when we started the terminal would consistently turn off mid-raid due to some of the AF members leaving the server. When asked about this they thought it was perfectly normal for a raid to stop being official when defenders leave during it. When raid became official once again there was a script that respawned everyone. This was very frustrating. Another frustration is how their servers are 20 people servers, making their enemy's activity virtually meaningless.
Overall they just need to fix their fort and they'll be a find group.
~~~ |
|
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
This thread has literally nothing to do with Gallantry.
~~~ |
|
|
their fort is easy to win at tbh
flood term room and you can position behind all the cover in the term and you're fine |
|
|
LOL THE BASE IS UNFAIR
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooo |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
Honestly, it's a 200 member group.
We're not going to make it a 50 man server.
You outnumbered us 15 - 5 most of the time which is an incredible advantage anyways.
You could flank too.
The obbies are on both sides of the walls.
I appreciate your input, but I disagree.
I will try to bring this up with the rest of HIGHCOM though. |
|
|
The base seems pretty fair to me. |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
@Alex, Even if you disagree with the fort being unfair at least get the terminal fixed.
~~~ |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
I don't believe there is anything wrong with the terminal.
If you have the term and there's less than the required amount of defenders, the clock will still tick. |
|
|
These guys lagswitched to win.
They cheat2win
Annoying group doesn't deserve a good community. |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
@Alex, We tested it during the raid because my members kept telling me the terminal was broken. Turns out if less than 5 AF members are in the server at any time the terminal turns off. Once it's 5 again the server respawns everyone to "Start" the raid.
~~~ |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
I AM PRETTY SURE no one in AF lagswitches.
I don't even know how to either. |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
It does not turn off if you have already capped it.
It only turns off if it's being capped or you're TRYING to cap while there's less than five defenders. |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
The only lag switch method I can think of is the cheat engine standard walkspeed increase button which lags everyone to cover up the person's speed up.
~~~ |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
@Alex, That's what I meant. When AF got to 4 people we couldn't even cap the terminal. So we left.
~~~ |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
Yes, that is how it is meant to work.
If you had already gotten the term, the clock would have kept going.
I don't think that should be changed either. |
|
|
wtf.... the reticle isnt that hard to see... just keep ur eyes open! dont squint it |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
It shouldn't work like that. A server shouldn't be unofficialized after it was already started for being official. That's essentially giving defenders the option to win just by leaving. Don't penalize the attackers just because the defenders retreated.
~~~ |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
"wtf.... the reticle isnt that hard to see... just keep ur eyes open! dont squint it"
When firing at people from long rank it's hard to see if the dot is on the enemy due to the other parts around dot.
~~~ |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
*long range*
~~~ |
|
AlexR1212Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288 |
It is not giving defenders the option of leaving to win.
If you HAVE the terminal, it will not become unofficial.
It does not allow people to quit because they are losing.
|
|
|
well thats for u but for me, i dont think it is actually hard for me |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
You misunderstand me. I never said they'd have to do it while losing. They'd obviously do it before losing or when they're tired of defending. Just because raiders have terminal doesn't mean AF isn't going to retreat, evidenced by our raid on them when they retreated while they had terminal.
~~~ |
|
|
i dont even know what had made u write this.. i mean like stop wasting ur time complaining -_- |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
How was this a complaint?
~~~ |
|