of     1   

KOTwarrior
#165682810Friday, June 26, 2015 11:12 PM GMT

Legalization of Skype Evidence Department of Justice - "Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur;" > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2015-003 Website District, June 26, 2015 — Today, the Website District U.S. Attorney's Office is formally announcing that evidence referencing Skype conversations is once again viable for the federal court system. Cases will not be denied on terms of “lack of evidence” under the circumstances of the only evidence being a Skype Conversation. What is the reason for the legalization and the recognition by the Website District U.S. Attorney's Office? In truth, Skype evidence has been legal since February 24, 2015 at 3:52 PM PST. The LORDAC Act (Clarity Act) passed the Houses of Congress and was signed into law by the President at that time. The LORDAC Act stated that any act not documented in the official Congressional Records; https://trello.com/b/ZXWK3eb4/usa-united-states-congressional-records is null and void. There is no act documented there preventing the use of Skype evidence, therefore, the Website U.S. Attorney's Office will now officially recognize that form of evidence. ### Signed, KOTwarrior Justice Department Website U.S. Attorney's Office District Attorney
Stellarics
#165683067Friday, June 26, 2015 11:14 PM GMT

no kot stop it
KOTwarrior
#165683183Friday, June 26, 2015 11:15 PM GMT

it's gonna b ok dom
dans59
#165683534Friday, June 26, 2015 11:19 PM GMT

finally
funtoad
#165683544Friday, June 26, 2015 11:19 PM GMT

goooo kot!!! ▌│█║▌║▌║fυитσα∂▌│█║▌║▌║ fє∂єяαℓ вυяєαυ σf ιиνєѕтιgαтισи,∂ιяє¢тσя ∂ємσ¢яαтι¢ иαтισиαℓ ραяту вσαя∂ мємвєя [#zєуℓυм] ¢αмραιgи мαиαgєя
DAVIDGC890
#165683565Friday, June 26, 2015 11:19 PM GMT

thank you DC US Attorney
MarkEmbloxII
#165683603Friday, June 26, 2015 11:20 PM GMT

I want an immediate investigation on KOTwarrior of possible bribery by Synapsic. Not only that, but he can't even read. The LORDAC didn't promote Skype as evidence at all. It also states that laws that are not well known are null and void and thus the case against me is NULL AND VOID. Thank you!
LordIntense
#165683605Friday, June 26, 2015 11:20 PM GMT

wat even
BlizzardDefect
#165683972Friday, June 26, 2015 11:24 PM GMT

Actually, Skype Evidence was Outlawed VIA a Court Case, are you stupid?
KOTwarrior
#165684043Friday, June 26, 2015 11:24 PM GMT

The Skype Evidence prohibition was not documented in the way asked for by the LORDAC Act; therefore it's void until Congress brings a vote to it again. Also, cases that originated during the time of illegality may not be brought to court (ex post facto). Your case may not use Skype evidence still. :) No need for an investigation, here's all my transaction history (sales). prntscr /7ls64b
Bakerley
#165684186Friday, June 26, 2015 11:26 PM GMT

LOL that was a quick shutdown Bakerley || i'm right you know || "ross the meanie tearing your bills to shreds since 2015" - fauxtillion
KOTwarrior
#165684202Friday, June 26, 2015 11:26 PM GMT

Blizzard, there is no documented court case saying that.
BlizzardDefect
#165684317Friday, June 26, 2015 11:28 PM GMT

There actually is, KnowDaGame probably knows which case it was, but I am pretty sure it was a Common Law type of case, if not Supreme Court.
smallchomama1234
#165684580Friday, June 26, 2015 11:31 PM GMT

@blizzard, actually that case ruled that a person cannot be fired over something they did on skype
KOTwarrior
#165684655Friday, June 26, 2015 11:31 PM GMT

No documented case in Supreme Court records. No cases other than USA v. FPIA which determined Common Law that completed either. https://trello.com/b/x5Kn68VC/usa-united-states-court-process https://trello.com/b/AbIXCsKb/usa-supreme-court-case Check for yourself.
Bakerley
#165684943Friday, June 26, 2015 11:35 PM GMT

the attorney general once said that skype evidence cant be used on the shout which was fair enough at the time end of story goodnight Bakerley || i'm right you know || "ross the meanie tearing your bills to shreds since 2015" - fauxtillion
MarkEmbloxII
#165685060Friday, June 26, 2015 11:36 PM GMT

I'll make a judge call for an investigation. Don't worry.
KOTwarrior
#165685073Friday, June 26, 2015 11:36 PM GMT

Baker, That's not what this debate was about. Nobody ever formally recognized that Skype Evidence was legal; that was then, this is now.
omar_dude
#165685825Friday, June 26, 2015 11:44 PM GMT

i gotta enroll myself to doj asap
Stellarics
#165686310Friday, June 26, 2015 11:49 PM GMT

pls kot i can get in lots of trouble :(
KOTwarrior
#165686789Friday, June 26, 2015 11:54 PM GMT

Go ahead and "investigate" me Marcus. A search warrant will only obtain what I just put out into the public domain. Want to subpoena my Skype logs? That can only be used if my ruling stands, but once again, I'll release that to the public domain (with Synapsic's consent). Marcus, this ruling doesn't make a difference in your case, as I've already explained. Ex post facto protects you from the Skype evidence being used in your case. Anyways, go ahead and investigate me Marcus, see what you find: nothing.
KOTwarrior
#165686837Friday, June 26, 2015 11:55 PM GMT

dom, old skype logs before this ruling can't be used (ex post facto).
InevitableBeast
#165689897Saturday, June 27, 2015 12:30 AM GMT

Totally agree, great job! "Drink Bleach! ©" || Chief Custodian || InevitableBeast
Famion
#165803929Sunday, June 28, 2015 2:51 AM GMT

i dont have a skype

    of     1