|
brady is gonna royally F*** every team when he gets back, going 15-0 or 16-0 en route to another super bowl.
tracking this |
|
|
good luck playing with inflated balls |
|
|
I don't say 16-0, mainly because we let our backups in when we secure first place..... |
|
|
not if the eagles have anything to sa oh who the hell am I kidding. |
|
|
balls were properly inflated when brady royally f***ed the best secondary of all time in the super bowl |
|
|
yeah he sure ****ed up their secondary by throwing 2 interceptions.
|
|
|
set the super bowl record for completions and went 8-8 and also went 13-15 for 124 yards and 2 TDs in the 4th quarter, leading the greatest comeback in super bowl history |
|
B00KF4CEJoin Date: 2014-07-29
Post Count: 2329 |
good luck playing with inflated balls |
|
|
"16-0" You guys will start out 0-4 without Brady cause he's carried the TRASH Patriots on his back for years. TRASHH have fun going 0-4 little boys |
|
|
"16-0" You guys will start out 0-4 without Brady cause he's carried the TRASH Patriots on his back for years. TRASHH have fun going 0-4 little boys"
You need good wide receivers too. |
|
|
15-0 or 16-0 once brady gets back. in case youre an idiot (which you likely are) that includes postseason games |
|
PiggyHDJoin Date: 2010-06-20
Post Count: 559 |
"leading the greatest comeback in super bowl history"
bait |
|
|
nope it is statistically the greatest comeback in super bowl history. no other team has comeback from down 10 points in the 2nd half |
|
RomoismJoin Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 43090 |
"leading the greatest comeback in super bowl history"
l
m
a
o |
|
|
yup theyre the only team to overcome a 10 point deficit in the 4th quarter |
|
BMLGUYJoin Date: 2011-07-20
Post Count: 36711 |
not if pittsburgh has anything to say about it
"bumle is died of RHL" - Koolboy123 | This is my siggy. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |
|
RomoismJoin Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 43090 |
The 2009 Saints are the only team to come back down from 14 points in the Super Bowl in win. That comeback is more impressive.
|
|
|
I don't think they would've won if it wasn't for that onside kick to start the third quarter, that took balls. |
|
|
not really because that comeback occurred partially in the 3rd quarter while the patriots had their comeback entirely in the 4th quarter. |
|
RomoismJoin Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 43090 |
it doesn't matter when it happened. it was the largest overcame deficit in Super bowl history. it is more impressive |
|
|
with double the time against a lesser defense. less impressive |
|
RomoismJoin Date: 2010-08-13
Post Count: 43090 |
yes but the offense they were against was more impressive than the one the patriots went against. |
|
|
|
doesnt matter comebacks are offense-centric for the trailing team and defense-centric for the leading team |
|
|
"set the super bowl record for completions"
because the patriots have ZERO running game, just like my falcons
"and went 8-8 and also went 13-15 for 124 yards and 2 TDs in the 4th quarter,"
good job, still didn't royally beat the **** out of anybody with those 2 interceptions
"leading the greatest comeback in super bowl history"
Malcolm butler is the only reason the patriots won lol |
|