|
I see people listing uaf as a top 5 clan, why is that? |
|
naritsJoin Date: 2013-01-13
Post Count: 13108 |
yolo amirite?
bumperino neighbourino |
|
HavocMindJoin Date: 2011-02-18
Post Count: 2284 |
Idk, but the people in UAF are typically nice. (or at least to me they are) |
|
icee180Join Date: 2013-07-22
Post Count: 16301 |
Teh U.A.F. Empire Declared Hostility O.n THe T.V.E. A.k.A The Vaktovian Empire S0 They Muust B Top 5!!!! |
|
|
because they beat vak without cheating like vak and sf does |
|
|
VorktuJoin Date: 2012-06-15
Post Count: 6372 |
because this is the first time VAKs publicly made their excuse and everyone called them out for it for once |
|
|
VorktuJoin Date: 2012-06-15
Post Count: 6372 |
hell yeah |
|
|
icee180Join Date: 2013-07-22
Post Count: 16301 |
VAK and UAF have proven that they're not superior than eachother, this is mainly because the war did not end how it was expected to, neither side reached the amount of wins required to be the victor therefore nobody wins (Obviously). UAF planned this our very nicely, publicity is what they wanted - they successfully achieved this. I think and have come to a conclusion that both clans were at fault during this conflict, both clans had their wrong-doings causing the war to collapse.
Do I care if this does not make any sense? Nooooo. |
|
SoraxiousJoin Date: 2014-04-04
Post Count: 3998 |
Idk but I tried it before, they have decent activity and probs cause they held off VAK
touka is my queen |
|
|
I would say something but I'll probably be called bias. |
|
CelestusJoin Date: 2011-08-15
Post Count: 14873 |
Activity and community are contributing factors I think.
The group seems to get on well, there is little conflict within it that I have experienced on observation.
Really a top 5 list can never be complete, I rate lists on ability to lose as well as ability to win. If people are sore losers and refuse to accept defeat despite being the weaker clan, I see that as much worse than a clan that outright loses. Fighting ability is not particularly important anymore, most of the best fighters are totally fluid in moving from one group to another.
To me a clan is rated upon it's organisation and community, I think UAF has both of these good. It certainly has a clan like feel. |
|
|
icee180Join Date: 2013-07-22
Post Count: 16301 |
"Activity and community are contributing factors"
RAT is far more active and has a much better community. |
|
|
personally i like uaf but idk if its a top 5 clan, i mean it might be but i dont rly know the reasons because i dont follow them to know that |
|
|
UAF isn't that active though. |
|
|
UAF did not go into this war looking for hype, lol. |
|
AssaltoJoin Date: 2011-12-31
Post Count: 9149 |
"RAT is far more active and has a much better community."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH OH MAN
good one
|
|
icee180Join Date: 2013-07-22
Post Count: 16301 |
Remember when UAF ignored Soticule Force's war declaration for 2 months? Oh. |
|
SoraxiousJoin Date: 2014-04-04
Post Count: 3998 |
personally my top 5 in no particular order is fc, sf, void, vak, and rat
touka is my queen |
|
ArovkJoin Date: 2013-01-08
Post Count: 6243 |
uaf beat vak |
|
|
More than 2 months, and then they get mad at vak for making them wait 9 days. |
|
|
Paul a clan that gets an average of 15 people per event and 40+ on to a ceremony/war is active in my eyes at least.
Plus most people in UAF has been in it for more than 2 or more years. Which is an incredible factor in the loyalty department. |
|