chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2   

Aetricity
#179220015Sunday, December 06, 2015 5:45 PM GMT

Long chain of "support" that I shall continue with: Support. Henceforth, we shall venture! | http://www.roblox.com/1-Post-item?id=318384228 | [+ ~2.9k]
TheUncommonOne
#179225099Sunday, December 06, 2015 7:11 PM GMT

Bump.
TrentWaike
#179229390Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:12 PM GMT

Support
shilvic5678
#179230265Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:26 PM GMT

I support this m9
CommanderwolfXX
#179230438Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:29 PM GMT

Support
DrCherryTop
#179230847Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:34 PM GMT

There's a major problem with the idea. Realize that the group owner is the only person who can distribute funds. Anyone, say in co-leader rank, can promote someone else which in-turn gives him more funds. Anyone that can promote can give or take away funds. The group owner and ONLY the group owner should be capable of distributing funds Cyclops with a plan. Lua and C++ Programmer
TheUncommonOne
#179231147Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:39 PM GMT

@Dr That's a problem that the owner himself would have to consider. It's not a flaw in the idea.
DrCherryTop
#179231763Sunday, December 06, 2015 8:48 PM GMT

Flaw or not, it can easily interfere with the funds. But I do have to support the idea. Support. Cyclops with a plan. Lua and C++ Programmer
ericawesome2134
#179235200Sunday, December 06, 2015 9:41 PM GMT

I kinda Agee heh.
TheUncommonOne
#179242196Sunday, December 06, 2015 11:25 PM GMT

@Dr It will only interfere if the owner were to allow it. Fix it by not allowing any other rank to be be able to rank up members. That or trust your high ranks, which should already be instated.
ForeverJTC
#179246582Monday, December 07, 2015 12:31 AM GMT

i support the boy weewee
TheUncommonOne
#179323205Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:28 PM GMT

Bump once again.
HollieSparkles
#179323443Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:35 PM GMT

no all money should go to me or no support u nob
Vandalistic
#179326859Tuesday, December 08, 2015 9:59 PM GMT

I think it's a decent idea, but it'd be spending a lot of money that can be used elsewhere. I mean, we can use the idea but only pay those who are active in the group (not trying to say anything but there's a lot of bod's/ other ranks that aren't active) so yeah it'd be a good idea but only to pay people who are active. "Why so serious? Let's put a smile on that face!" -The Joker
TheFlashIsFast
#179342089Wednesday, December 09, 2015 2:32 AM GMT

bump
WarEagIe
#179378526Wednesday, December 09, 2015 11:55 PM GMT

Agreeeeeeed
TheUncommonOne
#179456398Friday, December 11, 2015 8:42 PM GMT

Merp
TheUncommonOne
#181137277Tuesday, January 05, 2016 9:07 PM GMT

Bumppppppppp
TheUncommonOne
#182056711Wednesday, January 20, 2016 5:37 PM GMT

Bump it up.
TheUncommonOne
#183274838Tuesday, February 09, 2016 7:37 PM GMT

Bump

chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2