of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

EPIKGAMERMAN
#181487205Monday, January 11, 2016 9:05 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
R6Beige
#181487218Monday, January 11, 2016 9:06 AM GMT

Just because science is real doesn't mean it's correct!
AgnosticAnon
#181487309Monday, January 11, 2016 9:10 AM GMT

Science is a distortion of God's creations.
R6Beige
#181487468Monday, January 11, 2016 9:17 AM GMT

The horn. Get pr0v3d
EPIKGAMERMAN
#181487471Monday, January 11, 2016 9:17 AM GMT

"Science is a distortion of God's creations." science is the reason biblegateway.com was made
Debateyou
#181487485Monday, January 11, 2016 9:18 AM GMT

"Science is a distortion of God's creations." This comment is non-sensical, it has no merit.
Surreptitious
#181487681Monday, January 11, 2016 9:26 AM GMT

Demanding evidence for something theorized to exist and assuming it isn't real is detrimental to a scientific mindset. "Higgs Boson and quantum entanglement can't be viewed, so they don't," said many wrong individuals. The point of science is to discover, and while fact-checking is important, it's also important to understand that just because something isn't provable at the moment, it doesn't necessarily just stop being a thing. I don't have an opinion on the matter (I'm so distanced from religion that I can't even describe myself as atheist or agnostic), but I feel this is something to be pointed out.
Debateyou
#181487810Monday, January 11, 2016 9:31 AM GMT

"Demanding evidence for something theorized to exist and assuming it isn't real is detrimental to a scientific mindset." Actually demanding evidence for any claim is essential to the scientific mindset, it's also essential to science and the scientific method. God isn't theorized to exist, the claim a God is real is a failed hypothesis, it failed the testing phase. "Higgs Boson and quantum entanglement can't be viewed, so they don't," "said many wrong individuals. The point of science is to discover, and while fact-checking is important, it's also important to understand that just because something isn't provable at the moment, it doesn't necessarily just stop being a thing." No one states God doesn't exist, the statement is that there is no evidence for the existence of God, and thus you should proceed as if he doesn't until further evidence is provided, it would be ridiculous to do anything different and would destroy any scientific progress which you would wish to achieve, to act as if every single claim is true until it is either proven wrong or right is simply foolish.
R6Beige
#181487831Monday, January 11, 2016 9:32 AM GMT

THE HORN. THE HORN!
EPIKGAMERMAN
#181487867Monday, January 11, 2016 9:33 AM GMT

"THE HORN" someone doesnt know what h0rny means
Surreptitious
#181487893Monday, January 11, 2016 9:35 AM GMT

I'm not saying to accept it as fact, but rather not to exclude the theory. Just a thought to hold onto in these debates, because there's a whole lot of "is too/is not" going on here, and you're one of two people not trolling.
Debateyou
#181487929Monday, January 11, 2016 9:36 AM GMT

Science doesn't exclude any hypothesis, it simply dismisses them until they past the testing phase and become theories.
Sonrick98
#181488236Monday, January 11, 2016 9:49 AM GMT

Science is a method of study, not religion.
Surreptitious
#181488423Monday, January 11, 2016 9:58 AM GMT

I brought up the point primarily for the reason that there are religious scientists, out to make major discoveries to bring humanity closer to God. The Vatican has many devoted scientists and astronomers, and almost all of the major advances credited to Darwin in his theory of evolution came from various religious biologists, most of which believed that understanding our origin as a species would help us understand God's plan. I don't think we'd be able to prove any god in any near future, if ever, but there's a lot of doscussion to actually be had about the concept of an omnipotent being and the combination of faith and science.
Debateyou
#181488491Monday, January 11, 2016 10:01 AM GMT

Science and faith don't go together. A lot of scientists are also religious, and a lot of scientists are also not religious, as long as there religion doesn't prevent them from conducting objective studies then it isn't an issue. Faith is a belief without evidence, science relies on evidence.
Surreptitious
#181488683Monday, January 11, 2016 10:10 AM GMT

Faith ultimately leads to science. Faith is what progresses research, as nobody is going to look for something they don't believe in the potential for. Everyone seeking discovery has faith to some degree.
R6Beige
#181488695Monday, January 11, 2016 10:11 AM GMT

Shutting up is real, but flaming and contributing to this bait also is.
Bluelight855
#181489524Monday, January 11, 2016 10:55 AM GMT

I'm a christian that believes in evolution and science.
AnonyAnonymous
#181489578Monday, January 11, 2016 10:58 AM GMT

Yes, our Lord is quite real. The works of his hand are evident in our creation. Submit yourself to Christ and become his servant. Otherwise, you will punish on the day of divine cleansing. Retribution against those who defy him.
Debateyou
#181606444Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:49 AM GMT

"Faith ultimately leads to science. Faith is what progresses research, as nobody is going to look for something they don't believe in the potential for. Everyone seeking discovery has faith to some degree." Faith is the failure to do science, faith is the failure to progress science. Research and the acquiring of evidence is what advances science. Saying, I have faith and thus I shall not look for evidence does nothing. Faith is a belief without evidence, science relies on basing your beliefs on evidence. A lot of people look for things they don't believe in the potential for, faith isn't seeking, faith is to believe you've already found what you seeked but instead of finding evidence for it, you believe it without evidence.
Edginess
#181606459Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:52 AM GMT

@debateyou look down at your hands realise that you exist at all you now have sufficient proof for the existence of a conceptual god
DreamHeaven
#181606465Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:52 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
ectoplasmicHammer
#181606470Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:53 AM GMT

Not sure if bait, or legit debate.
twinblock
#181606506Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:58 AM GMT

@debateyou can you prove he isnt real? As an engineer, I say the glass is twice as big as it ought to be.
MightyDantheman
#181606507Wednesday, January 13, 2016 10:58 AM GMT

@Debateyou Now this is the time that being reverent isn't required. While being respectful towards religion, regardless if you agree with it or not, it still important. But the same goes for religious people pushing over their boundaries. DO NOT post anything religious, or related to religion, on ROBLOX. @Others As for the record, science IS correct as long as it an be proven true. Theories may not be entirely true, but that's the reason it's called a theory, and not a law. Don't go talking about something you don't understand. Your "God" that you believe in, real or not, says it explains everything that science doesn't. Maybe God is simply what science is explaining. Maybe God is not a humanoid figure at all. Maybe God is simply energy. Who knows. My point is this, don't bring religion to ROBLOX, and don't relate science and religion unless you understand both. ~MightyDantheman

    of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right