|
i myself, cant play them
they feel repetitive and boring to me
also, the bugs are massively gamebreaking
do they even bug test them prior to being released? |
|
|
why do people like anything tbh
|
|
GPKillerJoin Date: 2011-06-05
Post Count: 607 |
question is how to people not like fallout 4?? |
|
|
try Fallout 1 or 2, they're none of those things
2's the best, though
|
|
|
|
Because, nuclear weapons are bad and cool at the same time! I don't know, about nuclear fallouts but, hey it's nuclear. |
|
|
Well, it's the concept of freedom in a post-nuclear war open-world that you're supposed to enjoy. Some people find the appeal, some don't. If you don't find it fun within the first 20 hours or so, then there's really not much to do. You do get better weapons as you progress, which actually made me enjoy the game more. I could explore more of the game's map without fearing OP ennemies killing me. It still happens *cough cough* Deathclaws *cough cough* Radscorpions. |
|
boringJoin Date: 2007-06-16
Post Count: 50874 |
Everyone always talks about how buggy Bethesda games are.
But then I play them and come across very few bugs that barely impact the game.
Fallout 4 looks like they finally got actual good gameplay, but I heard they did pretty terrible in terms of RPG features. I'd still play it, though.
I've always preferred Elder Scrolls, myself. |
|
|
I have seen that as the Fallout games evolve they become less and less RPG and more and more shooters. I mean even Fallout 2 and Fallout 3 are completely different games. |
|
|
I never come across these game breaking bugs, only one I've seen is when the hit box gets messed up but I can fix it by restarting. |
|
C3N0Join Date: 2015-07-31
Post Count: 1429 |
because they do |
|
|
@boston.
never got to play fo3 even once
the game crashed on start, and no, my pc isnt a potato
it plays higher spec games just fine |
|
|
FO3 works fine on the 360. |
|