of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Shanksflake
#182861126Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:39 AM GMT

1. Most of the incidents have false info 2. Most of the incidents are not Incidents at all You guys need to learn the definition of incidents because you guys obviously seem to not know what an incident is or know the definition of it yet you guys have a page for it. Incidents are supposed to be things that affect OT in a certain way not something that affects like 10 people that somehow got noticed by someone who writes the "incident" on the "incidents" page 3. Half of them are just jokes made by a certain person [ These are Trolls , Not incidents ] Incidents and just people trolling to trick you all are NOT the same, Learn that Trolling =/= Incident 4. Some "Incidents" are so small that they don't even deserve to be on the page Here's one * " Oh lolol just gonna go on an alt and filterpass so i can get recognition and have a spot on OT wiki incidents" ( There are actually these written in OT incidents ) Again trolling =/= Incident 5. Encourages people to make an "incident" this includes - * People making threads about them wanting to die * People making a "if this gets # replies then i'll show my full body" * People making alts and spamming OT with " I rule all!!!" 6. There is only less than 10 legitimate incidents on the incidents page, The rest is just Trolling and things that are so little And also there are "incidents" that are written by people who weren't even there when it took place. - Lets face the truth ya'll , Almost anything done in OT can be considered an Incident by you guys. Don't believe me? Well once there was a "Ripped papers Incident" where the avatars changed to a box for a couple hours. You can go to the History Version and try and find it.
Shanksflake
#182861285Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:41 AM GMT

Don't ignore me, I'm right in every way.
lagio
#182861360Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:42 AM GMT

Yeah. Things like Katt Incident that actually get a mod post from people like SlingshotJunkie telling OT to stop is an actual incident.
Noochy
#182861371Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:42 AM GMT

Absolutely, tell it how it is Mr. Shanks. Vote El Presidente, or else.
roasteddasher33
#182861408Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:43 AM GMT

thats why OT wiki is trash, and it always will be. ~AND THATS WHEN I SAID " CANT LIVE WITH 'EM"~
cripplingdepression
#182861480Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:44 AM GMT

i don't care about your opinions wyue
GoshiDoll
#182861545Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:45 AM GMT

You make good points there, OP. Warning: Dates in calendar are closer then they appear.
blockopsmasteralt
#182861560Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:45 AM GMT

You can't really trust OT with anything that they can edit #code do SiggyText else print("Wanna buy a meme?")
Shanksflake
#182861595Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:45 AM GMT

"Yeah. Things like Katt Incident that actually get a mod post from people like SlingshotJunkie telling OT to stop is an actual incident" Read what I posted "6. There is only less than 10 legitimate incidents on the incidents page"
raceman6743
#182861638Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:46 AM GMT

You can't really trust OT with anything that they can edit [2] Chicka-chicka boom-boom, fricka-fricka you-you.
Anxious_Dragon
#182861684Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:47 AM GMT

Id say half of the incidents are OTer VS OTer To siggy or to not to siggy, that is the question.
SpareKash
#182861782Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:48 AM GMT

>puts descriptive info about Ouendans termination >gets it removed almost instantly >someone else post about a starbucks argument >stays forever ~america may not be the best country.... but america, is for sure better than the UK
Shanksflake
#182861972Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:51 AM GMT

El bb del ocho
oogeloog
#182862153Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:53 AM GMT

this is isnt a very good page "Slayer9991 and zace60 vs TheCrazyRavioli Rap War" rap wars THATS WHAT GUYS WHENEVER SOMEONE HAS A RAP WAR PUT IT ON OT WIKI
Completely_Useless
#182862210Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:54 AM GMT

why did you do a huge wordwall the ot incidents are trash thats it you dont need all that
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#182862288Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:55 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#182862444Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:58 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Completely_Useless
#182862517Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:59 AM GMT

@nteor the entire page is full of garbage most of it is based off a real incident, but its topped off with exaggeration there was this C&G raid that we did for fun and it got on the ot incidents and it had so much DRAMA it was unbelievable! then it was changed and it still had some drama but it was just a little raid and it got on there the only reason you admins arent getting sent anything is cause everyone believes the page even bait suicide threads get on there there was one i believe and it was a bait suicide and apparently it was on 'the news' even though there was no proof at all if you want to at least make people appreciate the ot wiki, remove the trash.
Slydexia
#182862623Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:00 AM GMT

WE SHOULD DIG UP ALL THE OT INCIDENTS AND PUSH THEM SOMEWHERE ELSE
Shanksflake
#182862803Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:03 AM GMT

"Any incidents with little to no proof of occurrence should be >>SENT TO THE WIKI ADMINS<<; vaguely whining about these incidents does NOT help" I gave evidence as to why the OT wiki page is faulty and overall stupid, You're calling what I clearly explained " vague" ? I find it incredibly pathetic that you want others to remove the non-incidents for you,You clean the OT incidents page from troll incidents and fake incidents You removed the Ripped Papers Incidents which you said was a troll and fake incidents, so you should know what an incident is and what is not right? If so, Why do you STILL let stuff that are not even worthy of being deemed or even being mistakenly called "incidents" on the page at all? In my opinion you REALLY should put the definition of Incidents on the OT wiki page, If you can't remove or have people unwilling to remove the fake and non incidents from the page, REMOVE the page all together. Heck even TheFineBros apology video is more convincing than that horrible excuse for a page
NumberFF0000
#182862916Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:05 AM GMT

The REDIVIAN incident needs to be removed as well which OP actually made the page if I am not mistaking
Shanksflake
#182863011Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:06 AM GMT

"why did you do a huge wordwall the ot incidents are trash thats it you dont need all that" Because there are people in OT who don't know what incidents means that will defend the page even when points are proven. That's why I made this wordwall "OT Incidents is stupid" won't make the cut, sorry
Tyranitar123
#182863049Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:07 AM GMT

I for one have fun reading about all the little things OT freaks out about. Am I a minority here?
Shanksflake
#182863102Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:07 AM GMT

"The REDIVIAN incident needs to be removed as well which OP actually made the page if I am not mistaking " If you went to the history and looked at the very last history page, You'd see the page was made by StickyNoteBandit, NOT me
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#182863209Tuesday, February 02, 2016 2:09 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right