|
When the seagull devours the penguin, it does not show mercy. It does not show repent. It does its job, what it's meant to do. It consumes its prey, taking it for itself. It takes what was once not its own and makes it his own. Mother nature has always been cruel, the same way that we have been. It is because we, as humans, are no better than animals. Acts of violence are simply the acts of us animals in our natural, unrestrained, state.
There is a shield protecting us from throwing the rock, but when the shield has be destroyed, there is no stopping anything. There is chaos, anarchy, and a sea of blood that keeps rising. We have come to a point, a point where the top has lost all sense of conviction. The bottom is filled with righteousness. There is no center truth. It is, as the 2,000 year approaches, the principle of nature. The worst will get to the top, and nature will be cruel.
|
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
k
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
spIashesJoin Date: 2010-07-01
Post Count: 12419 |
"seagull devours the penguin," huh?????
|
|
KimxiaJoin Date: 2015-02-02
Post Count: 11174 |
You have it all wrong. Look at humanity's cruelty towards nature. It is not nature that is cruel; it is us.
|
|
|
I am not stating that nature is cruel to us. I am stating that it is OUR nature to be cruel, the same way that nature itself is cruel.
The lion devours its prey. How beautiful.
A man kills another. Oh, how immoral.
The lion devouring the prey is essentially no different than a man killing another. The concept of morality is clearly, a flawed one. Morality is a myth; we tell it to the simpletons so that they keep in their files.
It is of human nature to form an aristocratic authoritarian government. This government will be cruel, brutal, and unforgiving. This is nature's form of government. There is no mercy; there is no repent. There is cruelty, suffering, and nothing else.
|
|
KimxiaJoin Date: 2015-02-02
Post Count: 11174 |
And I'm stating that nature is not naturally cruel. You're stating the obvious. We're all sinners. It's human nature to sin for us.
|
|
|
Refer to it as "cruelty," not this man-made guilt called "sin."
Nature is naturally cruel. When I am referring to nature, I am referring to mankind, other animals, etc.
The bird devours its prey. This is cruelty. Nature itself is so cruel; the idea that mankind should be any different is merely a myth shared by humanitarians.
|
|
spIashesJoin Date: 2010-07-01
Post Count: 12419 |
a bird eating a worm isn't cruelty, it's survival my boy |
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
yeah murder is cruel, hunting is not
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
|
Cruelty is necessary for survival. I have seen eagles devour bunnies; birds have fell by rocks propelled by my hand. Cruelty is a way of life, and it is one that nature shares.
It is simply that, we as humans, have labeled it as cruelty.
|
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
why are you throwing rocks at birds
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
|
I had experienced my true human nature. I had grew with thrill as the targets met their inevitable fate. Dropping and unable to rise, they were the suffers of nature. It was against the avians.
|
|
KimxiaJoin Date: 2015-02-02
Post Count: 11174 |
Eagles are supposed to devour bunnies. *facedesk*
No, sin is not man-made. It is in the unconscious and exists in everyone. Cruelty is the bi-product from sin.
Your first mistake was referring nature to mankind. You can not refer to mankind as nature.
A bird devouring its prey is survival. Depriving a bird the opportunity to fulfill its basic needs is cruelty.
Honestly, this sounds like a bunch of baloney written with "fancy" syntax in an attempt to strengthen your claim.
|
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
alright edgelord
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
KimxiaJoin Date: 2015-02-02
Post Count: 11174 |
did you really just call birds >avians<
pls stop
tis a lego game
you are not taking the sat sur
|
|
|
When I refer to the term "sin," I despise of it due to its Biblical connotations, so I had chose to use a different term.
The history of mankind is the history of animals, and with animals being a part of nature, humanity is in line with nature.
My point is that there is simply no such thing as cruelty, and I achieve this by stating that nature (not greenery) is cruel. Humanity is likewise cruel. When one is on the numerator and another one is in the denominator, they equal out. We are both cruel, but if there is nothing to compare ourselves against, there is no purpose of calling ourselves cruel. I can then state that there is no such thing as cruelty if I wanted.
If you want to ridicule these thoughts, then go ahead. I wouldn't expect a leftist to be able to comprehend these thoughts in the first place. I know who you are, and from the thoughts that suffocate my mind, no doubt is formed--you belong in a thread about content that only pertains to yourself and others, not to mankind as a whole.
|
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
well i hate to break it to you
but sin is Biblical
lol
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
|
You are clearly unable to comprehend these thoughts. I had already stated that the word "sin," has a biblical connotation, which is why I chose to use a different one to avoid confusion.
|
|
ZullwayJoin Date: 2013-10-21
Post Count: 15074 |
I read this while listening to a Native American flute song and oh my god I can't even handle myself right now |
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
no you're just unable to act like a normal human being and understand the natural food chain
:/
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
KimxiaJoin Date: 2015-02-02
Post Count: 11174 |
Yes, I am a leftist and you're in no position to tell others to belong in certain threads or what not. If anything, you're in the wrong subforum. Don't form generalizations off of people you hardly know. This is a virtual lego game. Chill your pantsies sir.
|
|
|
"no you're just unable to act like a normal human being and understand the natural food chain"
It is actually you that lacks acceptable reading skills. I am knowledgeable on the subject of the food chain. I accept the social hierarchy, as it is the defining factor of NatSocism. I accept the ways of nature. They are cruel, and I believe that therefore, there is no reason that mankind should be any different.
|
|
|
Clearly, I am superior in comparison to you. The exact reasons why cannot be discussed in public, as they would violate the RROC and upset the internet police. You know what I am getting at. Just think of evolution--apply it to the animal that stands up with two legs.
|
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
i'm convinced that you're baiting, but if you're not -
If you did anything in C&G, you'd see that I'm well versed in regards to medical issues. Therefore, one can logically make the deduction that I have the ability to not only read but to comprehend and learn medical effects.
Cruelty in your context is not cruelty. Rather, it is natural process of the world that you are identifying as cruel, because you believe that it's equal to human homicide.
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|
Z007Join Date: 2010-09-14
Post Count: 11729 |
oh now i'm doubly convinced that you're baiting
that or you literally have a mental issue
have fun
bad bait
- your friendly neighborhood medical nerd |
|