|
INTRO: Let's keep this short and simple, I don't like how the AG is over here defending our cases on the SC Trello or any trello at all, most times he doesn't even defend like he should & say Congress is at fault.. He literally only is trying to say he defends us to be granted access to the SC trello so he can blabber his mouth and speak on cards he shouldn't be.
Be it enacted by the House of Representatives and the Senate,
1. At any time Congress has a case against them, the leaders of Congress shall be responsible to defend or appoint someone from the DoJ to defend.
2. The AG shall be banished from the SC trello and the leaders of the Judicial Branch & executive branch must defend cases by their selves or appoint someone who is not the Attorney General to defend for them.
|
|
|
AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE AYE |
|
QolioJoin Date: 2014-09-28
Post Count: 1911 |
" At any time Congress has a case against them, the leaders of Congress shall be responsible to defend or appoint someone from the DoJ to defend."
Miranda Rights:
“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”
"If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. "
You don't get to choose. That is, unless you're wanting to contract your own defense attorney. Plain and simple.
Qolio,
Deputy Attorney General
P.S: Just because you don't like the actions of another user, you want to limit the power, per se, that they currently have? Lolno
|
|
|
This is right up there for stupidest bills I've ever seen. Attorney General is obligated to represent Congress or delegate someone else to do it, he's simply doing his job.
Also, WHY WOULD YOU BAN HIM FROM THE SC TRELLO? The Attorney General has prosecutor's jurisdiction over cases in which the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. The AG should be on the trello, JUST LIKE HOW THE SG IS ON IT SINCE HE HAS A REASON TO BE THERE.
ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇 |
|
|
""If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. "
You don't get to choose. That is, unless you're wanting to contract your own defense attorney. Plain and simple."
Are you dumb lol?
If its a company or a large body of people like a organization you get to choose who goes there and defend HENCE WHY BIG COMPANIES LET THEIR LAWYERS TAKE IT.
for someone in doj u sure dont know much
|
|
|
|
|
"If its a company or a large body of people like a organization you get to choose who goes there and defend HENCE WHY BIG COMPANIES LET THEIR LAWYERS TAKE IT."
yes because they're contracting their own legal team
that's literally what qolio just said
use your brain |
|
|
FruitsZ, I would expect Congress to be grateful that I'm here giving my time and my expert legal knowledge (expert in terms of NUSA's courts at least lol) to Congress free of charge; I'm just doing my job by defending Congress.
If you don't want me to defend a case, feel free to ask me to recuse myself, but since I'm the best attorney in NUSA, I have no idea why you WOULDN'T want me defending your actions, policies, bills, and laws. Additionally, since I represent the entire federal government before the Supreme Court (and since most cases relate to the federal government), I need to be on the trello since 3/4 of all cases are in my jurisdiction.
Leave court procedure laws to people who understand it, thanks.
Synapsic,
Attorney General of the United States |
|
|
"INTRO: Let's keep this short and simple, I don't like how the AG is over here defending our cases on the SC Trello or any trello at all, most times he doesn't even defend like he should & say Congress is at fault.. He literally only is trying to say he defends us to be granted access to the SC trello so he can blabber his mouth and speak on cards he shouldn't be."
You act like defending Congress is my only task; again, I represent the whole federal government, so the entirety of the Executive Branch is under my jurisdiction as well. Additionally, on the case that I assume you're talking about (lilwayne v. Congress), I simply stated that I wouldn't be defending Congress in that instance, which is well within my rights.
No one within the Department of Justice is required to prosecute or defend a case that we believe is unconstitutional, illegal, or otherwise improper; we have that right guaranteed under law. If you want to try to force a DOJ employee (other than me) to defend Congress, good luck with that, lmao; they won't listen to you if this bill passes. The bill is basically a bill of attainder, and I'll be damned if it passes.
Synapsic,
Attorney General of the United States |
|
|
"Attorney General Realistic Act"
>The bill bans the Attorney General from conducting cases in the Supreme Court.
super realistic, what a time to be alive. clap clap.
Synapsic,
Attorney General of the United States
Official Defender of the Federal Government in the Supreme Court :) |
|
|
Dear Congress:
With respect to section 2 of this Act, I'd like to inform you that pursuant to SC 0416-16-1, the Attorney General shall remain a member of the Supreme Court Trello unless removed by a board admin pursuant to SC 0416-16-1 add. 1, or by motion of the Supreme Court to do so.
The Supreme Court, although a public institution, exerts a personal property claim, protected by the Constitution, over the Trello board, and several other resources. See US Const. amend. V., sec. 1., cl. 3. Accordingly, it's within the discretion of the Supreme Court as to whether the Attorney General shall remain a member of the Trello board.
—
𝓞𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓦. 𝓗𝓸𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓼, 𝓙𝓻.
Justice, Supreme Court
United States
|
|