why cod succ - Roblox Forum Archive

Join Date: 2014-04-01
Post Count: 191

#189536965Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:40 AM GMT

cuz it not bf

Join Date: 2012-03-19
Post Count: 167

#189537410Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:50 AM GMT

"cuz it not bf" Tell me how Battlefield 4 was any different than Battlefield 3. (Not saying either of them were bad games.)

PyIot

Join Date: 2014-04-01
Post Count: 191

#189537461Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:51 AM GMT

lol should be saying the same thing w/ cod

superpswitch

Join Date: 2012-03-19
Post Count: 167

#189539149Sunday, May 22, 2016 5:28 AM GMT

I will admit, Infinite Warfare seems stupid. But people give Battlefield too much credit for not doing much.

Excilium

Join Date: 2011-06-01
Post Count: 5967

#189545656Sunday, May 22, 2016 10:08 AM GMT

A game not changing doesn't mean it's worse than another. In this scenario both games pretty much use the same formula all the time, but IMo Battlefield's is just better. Also, at least BF1 tried something somewhat new, unlike CoD.

Pidgey217

Join Date: 2013-12-26
Post Count: 2334

#189554134Sunday, May 22, 2016 2:20 PM GMT

"Battlefield 4 was any different than Battlefield 3" More weapons, attachments, gadgets, etc I don't know if it's just me but BF4 felt much faster (gameplay wise) than BF3 Changed classes and loadouts No blue tint Much lower TTK Suppression system is different Less teamplay (imo) VAULTING OVER THINGS (obv the most important part) Counter knifing Commander and spectator (I think) Sprinting while swimming, diving, and shooting while swimming Weapon zeroing More destruction Levolution Interactive stuff like elevators and bollards Counterknifing Weather stuff like Paracel Storm's storm and Gulf of Oman's sandstorm (I think there was also a map with a blizzard, but I haven't played Final Stand in a long time) TL;DR: BF4 is the sequel to BF3