|
Well, that makes no sense. You want to fight for gun rights, while at the same time not fighting against a decision to completely ban guns? You can't really do both.
|
|
|
@Mr. LawEnf0rcement I am glad you asked that because I am proposing that places more emphasis on the quality of interation with citizens because that's the main idea of a cop in my mind so I think we could do better I am not as focused on this issue as you probably realized but I am still concerned about this issue. I appreciate your interest in my positions it's important you know what your looking at before you support someone I am glad you show an interest in certain issues. |
|
|
@MrLawEnf0rcement your confused I apologize here is my position. I will fight for a piece of legislation to give citizens guns but in the unlikely chance it is struck down I will not appeal that decision that's my position I apologize for the confusion. |
|
chuba7Join Date: 2010-03-29
Post Count: 700 |
MrLaw, I'm sure he's willing to change his views based on the views of his supporters. There's still a long while left on the term. |
|
|
Yes, but that wasn't your main point for the Law Enforcement training portion of the forum. I'd like you to explain your position on the current training standards. Because, in my opinion, I believe that it's near perfection. It's unlike any other academy schedule I've seen in my entire time on ROBLOX. This has better Standards than Norfolk did, and we all know that Norfolk Officers were top notch.
|
|
|
Support
-Sam, Firestone Court Justice. |
|
KomaKingsJoin Date: 2011-07-05
Post Count: 381 |
Support.
|
|
|
No, I wasn't confused. I understood entirely. The basics of what you're proposing on gun rights for citizens is you'll fight for the rights to bear arms until you're challenged on the position. At which point you will basically chicken out and retreat. This is what has me concerned.
|
|
|
I would like to support you, as the other candidates really have no plan of action or seem anywhere near qualified but I have some concerns, and I think other people should be concerned about this too.
|
|
|
I would be happy to fully describe my ideas in a pm if you would like that, and then you can more directly communicate if your ok with that? |
|
|
On the issue of the POST standards. Lemme first say the fact we have such strong standards before we are even recruiting is astronomically better than any other state in roblox offers I have to agree with Mr.Law on that part. But I think we could do better in the citizen interactions aspect of this. I want to expand the POST standards to include a crash course in citizen interaction so we are not a state infected with police violence like rockport where 75% of their police force is inconsiderate, and harsh every time someone uses the wrong turn signal I am a huge supporter of the POST standards but I believe that's not the best we can do. |
|
NevadaLawJoin Date: 2013-05-21
Post Count: 145 |
Support!
|
|
|
Alright. But what about the gun rights? Why would you fend for the right to bear arms but then back it off if someone challenges you?
|
|
|
I apologize this is the final clarification on my gun stance. My stance is If anything that will ensure Firestone Citizens receive the right to bear arms I will be without a single doubt behind it. But in the unfortunate scenario a ban is enacted before or after that I will not vote or support the ban if enacted but I will not also make a large scale effort to try getting it repealed because it would have been voted upon by elected, and trusted officials who will disagree on what Firestones best interest is in this issue but to clarify I will support a citizens ability to bear arms in a Senate vote relating to that issue. |
|
|
Aight.
Got my support then.
LawEnf0rcement
|
|
KxngYeezyJoin Date: 2015-08-25
Post Count: 149 |
In your campaign message on the Firestone wall, it's rather intriguing as you state, "I am not a politician." A senator, is in-fact a political position. Therefore, if you are a senator, you are thus a politician.
Otherwise, I like your ideas and I believe you can do your job well.
-Support
CrownEnforcement, Firestone Senate Candidate |
|
|
I disagree with your occupation proposal. If someone is fired from a department (for whatever reason), they shouldn't have to wait 2 months before they're able to re-apply for a law enforcement department, or civil servant position. Once they're POST/NFA certified, they're qualified to join LE/FD. Either let the POST director decide, or let the heads of the department handle it.
|
|
|
But overall, you're clearly qualified. But I do hope you're able to reconsider the occupation proposal.
Support.
|
|
|
|
I am endorsing a few Candidates as there are multiple Candidates that will be voted in.
So, I am endorsing this Campaign for Senate.
Signed, QuickHead555
Businessman
Frontrunner of Stapleton C.E. Election |
|
|
Thank you so much Mr.QuickHead555 I appreciate the endorsement, and I have already endorsed you in your race I wish you good luck, and I appreciate this greatly.
PatrickBARblx14 |
|
|
bobjohn10Join Date: 2012-05-14
Post Count: 50 |
Support |
|
|
Hello, I've read your speech. It's a wonderful speech and I plan on supporting your campaign but I do have one question before I officially support you for Senate.
- Regarding the "Obtainable Legal Weapons" section, what guns do you plan on making legal, and illegal?
- Regarding the "Leaving/Switching Departments", I think the limit should be 1 instead of 2 months. My opinion, and no debate on why it should be such said time limit.
Thank you for reading this comment regarding your run for Senator.
I'm eager to see your answer(s) to the concerns I made above.
For now, I'm Officially supporting you in your run for Senator.
Signed,
iiKateeee |
|
teqiqJoin Date: 2012-08-07
Post Count: 578 |
Wonderful speech, and I hope every citizens pitches in and assists this wonderful candidate in his run for Senator.
Signed,
iiKateeee |
|