BEFORE YOU READ VAK: I know most clans do this, but you do it the most.
Bear in mind that most of the events I bring up here come from memory, VAK may feel free to correct any errors I make. I'm not an alt, blah blah blah.
Now there are a few forum posts that VAK are at it again, banning raiders. I don't take sides, these bans may be overexaggerated by the people that made the forums, but about three or four months ago LordMiltonious/espressos (who was co-incidentally banned from SMO about 20 minutes prior to this thread) released a video CLEARLY showing a Vaktovian lagging majorly (or more likely LS'ing), and no punishment was handed out as far as I'm aware.
But then there's VAK's hypocrisy; it's alright if VAK does it for their own gain, but when a Raider does it? Banhammer time! It's utter lunacy, I mean what's even the point of there being a base if you're just going to ban the raiders for BS reasons? Or we'll just sweep that under the rug, shall we?
Then there's the point that really gets me. When you attempt to report a Vaktovian doing something they shouldn't, they ask for proof. When you supply that proof, instead of actually dealing with it, most of the time they'll claim that it was edited or something. But if a VAC claims you did something without ANY proof, most of the time you're banned. I suppose that all clans do this, but VAK do it the most. And it's frustrating.
THEN there's the case with the controversy a few months ago, where there was all this about a few VAKs being in a seperate TS3/Skype/something chat just to insult their own clan. I don't know the exact details on this, and though they were eventually caught and exiled, I KNEW VAK would be just desperate enough in that some of those culprits are now back in Vaktovia's ranks.
THEN there's all the wars they've had. VOID, TGI, that potential war a few months ago that was called off for some BS terms... sort yourselves out. |