of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

SadScount414
#192308673Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:48 AM GMT

Like RSF, Falsewarrior is becoming another fruitbox
scheil3e
#192308956Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:52 AM GMT

Did RSF become another fruitbox? I don't understand this message.
Shattered_Realities
#192309146Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:54 AM GMT

what did false do this time?
BongoyPatriot
#192309191Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:55 AM GMT

Remember last month when UAF was in full force trying to convince everyone they were a top 5 clan? Funny times.
Falsewarrior000
#192309244Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:56 AM GMT

Eh? Rebellion?
SirBackspace
#192309274Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:56 AM GMT

i mean uaf is a top 15 clan and theres an argument for it to be placed higher : )
scheil3e
#192309462Wednesday, June 29, 2016 1:59 AM GMT

"Remember last month when UAF was in full force trying to convince everyone they were a top 5 clan? Funny times." Except for the fact that it didn't happen. What you're referring to is much longer time ago, shortly after having VAK, "the best clan on ROBLOX", cower out of having a war with us. They basically thought Phoenix City was unfair (LOL), while insisting on updating SMO (II?).
BongoyPatriot
#192309571Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:00 AM GMT

No, I'm talking about last month, nothing to do with VAK lol
scheil3e
#192309616Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:01 AM GMT

Oh, False, read the contents of this: prntscr/7zgihq According to the rules they agreed to, you're allowed to declare victory over VAK. Remember the "we lose if we're not ready by X date" war term? They didn't meet it twice. I'm 5ancu btw.
Falsewarrior000
#192309626Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:01 AM GMT

I don't remember this, Baron_BigHead. Would you mind reminding us all what happened?
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#192309649Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:01 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
scheil3e
#192309655Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:01 AM GMT

That's an imaginary occurence, feller.
BongoyPatriot
#192309716Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:02 AM GMT

UAF tried starting a war with RAT that fell through after FoA decided to stop trying to carry them. Was a whole month of people insisting that UAF was actually good as an individual clan and was pretty hillarious
icee180
#192309733Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:02 AM GMT

Falsewarrior, please read your messages.
Shattered_Realities
#192309744Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:03 AM GMT

"uaf is a top 15 clan and theres an argument for it to be placed higher : )" lol top 15 there's like less than 5 decently active clans and they're all filled with edge lords
Falsewarrior000
#192309873Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:04 AM GMT

Eh? You mean the war that RAT declared against UAF, agreed to the use of allies, and then complained when FoA helped UAF and was acknowledged for doing so? The very same war where RAT has discontinued negotiations?
BongoyPatriot
#192309961Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:06 AM GMT

Yeah that one
CPTKurkIV
#192309966Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:06 AM GMT

DEATH IS A PREFERABLE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMUNISM
JamalMarley
#192309969Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:06 AM GMT

UAF isn't in danger of being permanently damaged under False. There are other solutions to issues within a group than a rebellion.
theonlyconner
#192309986Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:06 AM GMT

Go get them false
scheil3e
#192310180Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:09 AM GMT

"UAF tried starting a war with RAT that fell through after FoA decided to stop trying to carry them. Was a whole month of people insisting that UAF was actually good as an individual clan and was pretty hillarious" Fallacy #1: RAT declared the war, no UAF Fallacy #2: FoA declared their support, consequently RAT started complaining Fallacy #3: RAT started gathering their own allies, eventually UAF had 3-4 enemies, while RAT had only 1 Fallacy #4: ROBLOX user zepenguin04 discovered that RAT's forts were greatly rigged towards defenders, discovering that RAT's guns did 2 more damage than the raiders', as well as Polymorphic, the RAT leader, admitting to having given himself and the entire RAT team extra health on an occasion during a defense. RAT also proceeded to abuse division weapons against UAF and allies, yet complained when UAF made our own take on division weapons, to appoint the irony in giving elite division members advantages. Fallacy #5: No one actually argued that UAF was "top 5", only that they were better than RAT, who were considered "top 5", despite condoning cheating and other acts of scumbaggery. Basically, the argument was that if RAT is "top 5", then UAF is too, essentially meaning 'UAF > RAT' to demean them for cheating. Despicable advantages were also discovered at SC's fort (Icarus, is that the name?), a clan who lent its arms to RAT, following their frustration with clans having solid alliances. Get schooled.
scheil3e
#192310252Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:10 AM GMT

RAT declared war, not UAF* I can't type for my life right now, 04:00 AM.
BongoyPatriot
#192310255Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:10 AM GMT

RAT cheating still doesn't mean that UAF is better than them as a clan lol
Falsewarrior000
#192310503Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:13 AM GMT

Rebellion? Eh?
scheil3e
#192310548Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:14 AM GMT

"RAT cheating still doesn't mean that UAF is better than them as a clan lol" Not according to the clan world's logic, but any intelligible individual would recognize and acknowledge the case there is to be made that cheaters should never be regarded as a good clan at all. It is very easy and simple to achieve success by cheating, just look at VAK. Cheated against TGI through base updates, made jetpacks and laser cannons (and more) at SMO when FC declared war on them because they don't like bows and barrels, couldn't even meet the date for their fort to be done and dusted for war against UAF because the fort updates necessary for them to assure that they could win the war convincingly were too time consuming. There are quite a few incidents that speak against "top clans", and questioning whether they can even be regarded as such.

    of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right