In case you didn't know, I currently have a judicial review on me. To get more information about it, you can visit the Trello card:
https://twitter.com/RobloxRotamos/status/753813778412613633
Most of this evidence is false, others have reasonable explainations and others, I was at the wrong.
Starting with the first gyazo gif, I will go through all of the pieces of evidence and explain them.
1. "Him murdering a guy"
The person who I murdered was aidtastic5, who had just attempted to kill me along with other innocent civilians before the time the GIF was taken. As he continued to try to kill me, I continued to fight back. He was a the wrong. I didn't do anything wrong there. For those that don't know, I am permitted to give myself an M4A1 using admin.
2. "That guy arresting him"
Some of you may know aidtastic5 as the guy who FA'ed an entire server and got banned for it. As it was just a server ban, he's back now, but he decided to false arrest me. As I stated in the paragraph above, he was at the wrong and he should not be using his DPD rank to give payback to people who he dislikes.
3. "AA'ing to get out of the prison"
As it was a false arrest, I am allowed to change my prison time to 0. I also do this for other civilians who were wrongfully arrested. I did not do anything wrong here.
4. "AA'ing to get him into the prison"
I've seen somebody do it before, but I understand that it doesn't mean I can do it too. I never took the step to ask if I was allowed to do so, and I do admit that I should've simply asked for a law enforcement agent to arrest him for abuse of tools and off-duty crime. As he would still have the same consequences as if I manually put him in prison, I felt like it wouldn't have been a big deal, but looking back, I should've realized that I should've thought twice. This was a simple mistake from me.
5. "Lieing"
I was just stating what had happened, and lying is not in any way unconstitutional, especially when you consider the fact that I wasn't even lying. There was no proof that I was lying, either, so I have no reason to be accused for it. This screenshot should be 100% invalid.
6. "Banning someone just because they had a similar name"
When it gets to this level, I feel like NiftyNiftBro is just desperate to get me impeached. He has absolutely no idea what happened and shouldn't just consider that I'm abusing admin. I banned him for exploiting. I have no proof of that, but I'll tell you that all of the people banned from Harford for exploiting have an account age of 0, but by the time you're reading this thread, it'll probably be more. You can check the trollinpants1 account yourself if you want and take a look at the account age. Just like other exploiters, this one was killing other people without a weapon. This is completely invalid.
I'll explain the other pieces of proof tomorrow, as I want to get this out there as soon as possible.
~trollinpants |