of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

AutoPiIot
#194047528Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:06 PM GMT

Yo, y'all calling us bad yet you refuse to defend your own fort for a raid so we can't even raid you. honestly that's pitiful smh
Laedere
#194047562Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:06 PM GMT

stop being toxic
stitched
#194047603Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:07 PM GMT

stop being toxic [2]
AutoPiIot
#194047609Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:07 PM GMT

not being toxic. if they're refusing to defend so we can't raid that just throws the war to be one-sided
War_Resurrection
#194047656Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:07 PM GMT

We didn't call you bad, lol We stated that you broke the war terms.
assassin_lord
#194047690Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:08 PM GMT

you just raided 2 servers at fang and won't let us get in hailstone lol
AutoPiIot
#194047735Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:08 PM GMT

@assassin we waited an hour just for a raid last night smh
ScorchSlayer
#194047814Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:09 PM GMT

You guys just server hopped four times. gg.
LordIntense
#194047819Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:09 PM GMT

you decided to raid as we were raiding you JC isnt that active to do both, so not our problem
ScorchSlayer
#194047908Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:11 PM GMT

You guys did have enough for the raid, but lost members during each server hop.
assassin_lord
#194047998Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:12 PM GMT

we didn't lose anyone you pre-flooded with 15 to make it a 15v9 (sc being 15) at your own fort and then place commanded yourself every time we hopped to prevent being outnumbered not to mention you put in updates that weren't agreed.
AutoPiIot
#194048122Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:14 PM GMT

jc put in an update that wasnt agreed too, invis brick above term
ScorchSlayer
#194048203Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:15 PM GMT

First off we all had tabs open, keeping an eye on the excepted server hop. We shutdown the previous servers because there weren't enough raiders left and the server was made official. Second, what updates?
Ultrios
#194048377Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:17 PM GMT

Sach@ it was freaking glitch lol. We didnt called u bad we stated that SC broke their own war term.
assassin_lord
#194048379Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:17 PM GMT

so you're telling me you had 15 sc in one server and couldn't leave 8 behind and send the rest to other server to defend?? you shutdown 3 servers tht u cuda defended 'cause you had more than enough sc on standby. pathetic honestly. also you gave yourselves a mountain spawn
AutoPiIot
#194048516Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:19 PM GMT

"so you're telling me you had 15 sc in one server and couldn't leave 8 behind and send the rest to other server to defend?? you shutdown 3 servers tht u cuda defended 'cause you had more than enough sc on standby. pathetic honestly. also you gave yourselves a mountain spawn" 1) we already had a mountain spawn, doesnt fang have it too? 2) preflooding is better than serverhopping three servers
legomada
#194048659Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:21 PM GMT

"jc put in an update that wasnt agreed too, invis brick above term" Wut?
ScorchSlayer
#194048660Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:21 PM GMT

Why would we defend a server that was official at first but had only three raiders at the end? Four raiders are less the raid becomes void. The mountain pass has always been there and is equivalent to how JC has access straight to cliffs. JC literally spawns right next to the terminal and has a height advantage.
kelsters101
#194048687Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:21 PM GMT

"1) we already had a mountain spawn, doesnt fang have it too?" no sc never had a mountain path and serverhopping is a tactic used at some point by every clan, nothing wrong with that
ScorchSlayer
#194048817Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:23 PM GMT

We always had the mountain access. I have nothing against serverhopping, but there is a limit to how many times you serverhop in one raid.
kelsters101
#194049106Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:26 PM GMT

unless you stacked up, you never had mountain access
assassin_lord
#194049128Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:27 PM GMT

"The mountain pass has always been there and is equivalent to how JC has access straight to cliffs. JC literally spawns right next to the terminal and has a height advantage." First of all, no it hasn't that's a blatant lie. Second of all, JC spawn behind the 2nd gate so it's impossible for them to spawn right next to terminal that doesn't even make sense. The cave that leads to height advantage is easily camped and there's no cover on top.
actuallyUnd
#194049183Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:27 PM GMT

If I see you make a thread like this again I'll have you removed from SAFEGUARD.
Ultrios
#194049189Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:27 PM GMT

First of recall, Fang had mountain access because it was ulimately outnumbered by raider 17-8. Making it difficult for JC for to break the Cave Also, Fang II was updated under SC agreement to remove Above term glitchy brick. And we just noticed that there was something wrong with Hailstone was being updated by putting spawn on mountain without JC permission.
ClearPilot
#194049353Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:29 PM GMT

At the start, SC was raiding in 1 server and we were waiting in the second server. You guys said, "We're not going to defend 2 servers." Don't come up with the inactive excuse, because JC came and left and atleast 10 JC came through that server. JC even kicked a few to keep it unofficial. https://www.roblox.com/My/Groups.aspx?gid=2586975 in-dev atm

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right