of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

TheShadowMessage
#198799613Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:09 PM GMT

"TRA is good" "TRA got better since the A-SOV war" AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
superlosersx3
#198799921Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:18 PM GMT

It was going decently before the terms were changed. None the less it was always clear VAK was likely to win.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198800062Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:22 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
xElectroBear
#198800132Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:24 PM GMT

The funny thing is if there is any more than 9 defending VAK wont deploy, I know this because I was in VAC at the beginning of the war.
Destrono
#198800991Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:46 PM GMT

> We gave you a 2.5 score headstart and from there you're only gained like 3 points. Goggles and sweatbands make me play good!
LordIntense
#198801033Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:47 PM GMT

Salt that's called being smart rofl
Pyroux
#198801489Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:58 PM GMT

""TRA is good" "TRA got better since the A-SOV war" AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA" I can 100% guarantee that you're unable to do any better defending Tonigrad. Before you go talking about how bad a clan is, realize the position that they're in. Here is why we're doing poorly in this war VAK is a power clan, they rely on small numbers. They wanted a 8v15 so they could outnumber us and assure a win. TRA got the bad part of the deal in this since TRA relys on large numbers. Our average members doesn't compare to the average VAC/VAK. With the numbers VAK uses to raid SMO, they organize themselves to guard certain positions. Cliffs shooters are almost impossible to kill unless we get an aircraft which takes 5 minutes to respawn. There is only 1500 seconds till raids win. I'm going to make the list smaller because I'm sure you're too ignorant to read this. 1. TRA got the bad end of the negotiations 2. VAK is more organized at raiding Tonigrad than any other clan that has ever attempted to win there. 3. TRA relys on numbers, at which this 8v15 screws us over.
RagedTech
#198801732Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:04 PM GMT

ignorance is bliss. realize we dont exile/demote/yell at people for not being good gunfighters. our terms are screwed too badly, and vak wouldn't even accept this war if we did have actual fair terms. and he's right, vak won't deploy to places that have over 9 people LOL idk why you think theyre so good.
LordIntense
#198801916Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:08 PM GMT

TRA won't deploy to SMO if it has more than 9 defenders Hypocrite?
igoing2win
#198801943Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:08 PM GMT

cant really raid if theyre always raiding us
LordIntense
#198802039Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:11 PM GMT

So you're mad at us for being active?
Destrono
#198802044Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:11 PM GMT

igoing well maybe deploy first? Goggles and sweatbands make me play good!
superlosersx3
#198802054Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:11 PM GMT

The initial changing of terms on the first day ruined any chance of a war victory. It was stupid to subcom to that rule but it is apparently to be lived with.
RagedTech
#198802093Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:12 PM GMT

we do raid smo................. we raid and it's a struggle for them to even get there and defend. we also are not the type of people to sit in their base all day and farm 40 mins wins like loosers... we actually go to where the fight is unlike 99% of clans that only raid
LordIntense
#198802094Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:12 PM GMT

Just like it was stupid how TRA added aimbot to their base second day of the war.
Rizicks
#198802096Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:12 PM GMT

VAK are able to raid and defend at the same time igoing
LordIntense
#198802156Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:13 PM GMT

Raged what you said makes no sense
RagedTech
#198802178Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:14 PM GMT

our dev did it outta nowhere cause he got mad. we were honest and admitted to it and removed it. funny cause if vak were losing this war they would probably add some cheat and not admit to it.... vak is notorious for dirty play in wars
superlosersx3
#198802215Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:15 PM GMT

A dev made a mistake in the scripts and that was changed back and you were awarded wins so idk y u would complain.
LordIntense
#198802279Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:16 PM GMT

Epic false accusations!
LordIntense
#198802299Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:16 PM GMT

Not complaining, just stating an opinion like you did.
DystraTala
#198802336Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:17 PM GMT

Lol Vak has to war weaker clans and then #### them in negotiations so they can win and then try to pass it off as an honorable victory
Pyroux
#198802355Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:18 PM GMT

VAK knew if they didn't put a defender cap on TG they would lose 70% of the time, Defending TG is pointless at this rate since the outcome is always a loss for TRA. "TRA won't deploy to SMO if it has more than 9 defenders Hypocrite?" Our average TRA members don't compete with the skill and communication VAK have at SMO. We wait for our good fights to get online and raid. We don't rally to raid because of the following, 1. We need our best people to defend and atleast try to win a defense at TG since the terms completely screwed us over defense wise. 2. After war terms changed to a forced 8v15 at TG, majority of TRA members lost interest in the war. If you actually check the defenders its always the same TRA members. I've been defending TG since the start of the war and havent touched SMO since.
daeshH
#198802377Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:18 PM GMT

Deluxe is pretty bad.
Pyroux
#198802455Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:20 PM GMT

I'm in the developers division, what Raged said is 100% true. We had him remove it completely from his module so there is no way for it to be brought back. He added it himself without any HR's approval and out of frustration. Also agreeing with Raged statement that VAK has been known to do some dirty plays.

    of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right