|
|
I don't know how removing it made ROBLOX any better, could someone explain to me? |
|
TracerialJoin Date: 2015-07-21 Post Count: 614 |
Bring back lifetime subscriptions. 100% Support |
|
sonickyleJoin Date: 2009-01-01 Post Count: 5653 |
Lifetime made ROBLOX Corp lose money as the player wouldn't have to buy any more BC subscriptions. Yeah it did cost a large amount of money but after a few years the player essentially has free Builders Club.
(that and lifetime wasn't actually lifetime. I think it actually lasted for 100 years? idklol) |
|
KariboXDJoin Date: 2015-10-16 Post Count: 12 |
YEEEESSS LIFE TIME BC!!! |
|
|
|
They could atleast bring back 6 Month, that way ROBLOX isn't losing any money.
|
|
|
I think they should add back lifetime. It's no fair for the dedicated ROBLOX players that joined after removing lifetime BC, as opposed to people who were around to buy lifetime BC. ROBLOX should be happy they have dedicated members. Plus, how could it hurt them? The lowest price for lifetime was $200, how much more can you ask for?
Support me! https://www.roblox.com/catalog/525123017/Support-Landry-Jones |
|
|
|
[Lifetime is pretty arguable and most of them have already been posted. ¬_¬]
6 months, on the other hand? I... really didn't get why they removed that one. All I saw from this was less options and a new oversized duration gap.
|
|
|
I can understand if ROBLOX doesn't want to bring back lifetime membership, but removing 6 month was so unnecessary, seriously...
|
|
|
|
didnt know 6 month membership was gone too wtf
|
|
|
|
6 month Memberships, yes
Lifetime? No.
Get out |
|
|
I think they should and it could be expensive but I would still like to have the option |
|
leo1457Join Date: 2014-05-01 Post Count: 6921 |
lifetime no
6 month ye
|
|
|
"it lasted 100 years"
then just take the cost of .1 year BC (57.95) and multiply it by a hundred l-
/57.95 * one hundred is over five thousand dollars
oh jesus |
|