of     1   

Matthew_Castellan
#206588875Saturday, January 07, 2017 2:09 PM GMT

Youtube910 has been completely inactive so far in his LVCC term. He has not made a single bill and is usually late with his votes or does not vote at all. If this passes, Youtube910 will be removed from Las Vegas City Council. Signed, Councilman Matthew_Castellan
Xarbleed
#206590019Saturday, January 07, 2017 2:44 PM GMT

Aye, Youtube910 is inactive.. Xasix | Zaz-ix
spyagent388
#206603356Saturday, January 07, 2017 6:45 PM GMT

Its been a month, I have to aye
HershB
#206612459Saturday, January 07, 2017 8:40 PM GMT

I would aye, but he DOES vote. Though I am not happy with him not presenting any, he does vote when he can. He has a job and is probably studying for midterms. Nay Unknown ATRer and pretty chill GFXer
Prozulous
#206612770Saturday, January 07, 2017 8:42 PM GMT

nay
Matthew_Castellan
#206621137Saturday, January 07, 2017 10:02 PM GMT

proz you have to say why you voted nay, reasoning bill.
HershB
#206624947Saturday, January 07, 2017 10:47 PM GMT

Agreed. Proz, your vote is hereby void. You may revote, but please follow the voting rules. Unknown ATRer and pretty chill GFXer
Youtube910
#206637752Sunday, January 08, 2017 1:20 AM GMT

Nay because I still vote. I just can't think of any worthwhile ideas. Most of you guys have trash ideas that paul would never get around to building or implementing. I hate for it to sound rude, but if you actually have had LVCC experience as much as I had, you'd know that Paul won't probably do anything with your idea for a long time if at all. If I can't make something actually useful then I'll wait until I get an idea that's good.
jcc98
#206637836Sunday, January 08, 2017 1:21 AM GMT

Aye, Youtube910 is inactive..
Prozulous
#206638848Sunday, January 08, 2017 1:32 AM GMT

nay bc ppl have lives and it seems matthew wants people to be on 24/7
Vursuz
#206647526Sunday, January 08, 2017 2:58 AM GMT

Aye
AntonioVillavicencio
#206647903Sunday, January 08, 2017 3:01 AM GMT

Youtube has more experience than you all and makes a very viable point, thus I urge councillers to vote nay. #SoaRAAorDIE
Matthew_Castellan
#206663020Sunday, January 08, 2017 5:53 AM GMT

I don't want them to be on 24/7, I just want them to actually be a little bit active.
TargetList
#206723270Sunday, January 08, 2017 10:32 PM GMT

Personal Opinion/Vote; Nay. I don't really agree with this - even though my opinion doesn't count and I personally haven't seen him really present many bills; A.) You have to understand that he has other things to do aswell. B.) He is active in a form if he manages to vote on some bills, so I don't really get your point on the: "I don't want them to be on 24/7, I just want them to actually be a little bit active," statement as it wouldn't apply to him in a form, since he >does vote< on certain bills. C.) This isn't the first time a bill like this was formed against him. I agree with what Hersh had stated along side with with YT had stated aswell himself.
Prozulous
#206752059Monday, January 09, 2017 4:50 AM GMT

you say you dont want him on 24/7 and a little active or w/e but in your bill you literally said he "is usually late with votes" isnt that being a "little bit active" lol
Xarbleed
#206787994Monday, January 09, 2017 8:48 PM GMT

Well literally the only bills he votes on is either on the companies he owns like C-SPAN, BoA, or TTS or on the bills that directly affect himself. Xasix | Zaz-ix
AntonioVillavicencio
#206789494Monday, January 09, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

What is what an LVCC counciller is meant to do lol he's meant to represent himself, the people, and whatever businesses he is tied too.
Mr_Barron
#206821495Tuesday, January 10, 2017 4:03 AM GMT

Nay bc of what Jerry said
Mr_Barron
#206821534Tuesday, January 10, 2017 4:03 AM GMT

Hersh* That somehow autocorrected to jerry...

    of     1