of     1   

Quantum_Falcon
#208146228Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:35 AM GMT

Hello everyone, Today I am running for House of Representatives in Rockport. Before I get into anything else, I want to discuss my past in Rockport. I've been involved in Rockport since the late part of 2014 (so I've been around for a little more than two years). I ran for House in the spring of 2015 and succeeded. After that, I served in the House until Spring of 2016 when I left. During my time in the House, and even until now, I've been a controversial figure to say the least. While I was in the House, last time, although I did many things, I also did and said a few things that I shouldn't have said. If you were here then, you will remember those incidents. Now, I'm extending my apologies for those instances. I believe that I acted in my personal interests more than the interests of the State. This contributes to the reason that I'm a controversial figure now, as many remember what I did. In the end, I left because I didn't feel like I could get anything done. At that point, nobody was listening to me and I was basically stalled. With all that being said, I'm not going to sit here and say that I'm a perfect candidate. I definitely have flaws (as does everyone else), but I hope that you will still vote for me. Now, let's talk about some of the good things I've done. While I was in the House, I did several things. Most notably, I was the original author of Amendment VIII (originally IX) to the Rockport Constitution (although it has unfortunately been significantly edited since). I also fought for more features in Rockport cities as well as for the accountability of Rockport Developers and TRC officials (of which there was very little at the time, but I'm happy to say that it's gotten a lot better, it is also what caused some of the conflicts I had). The reason I'm running for House is that I see that there are a few problems in Rockport that I want to work on. Three big things I want to get done: - Ban people who are C/PoT (C/PoT sentences are usually only a few days- 5 tops, but a rarely see that. As it stands now, C/PoT is just a meaningless title. C/PoT should really mean something). - Give Rockport some voice in TRC. - Establish an organization for Developer oversight. - Add TSA teams to Oxford and Lakeshore and make TSA responsible for securing the airports there. So there you go. That's me. If you have questions, I ask you to PM them to me, and I'll be more than happy to answer. If you support me, be sure to leave a reply such as "Support!" Thanks for reading! QuantumSwag, Rockport House Candidate Head of Rockport TSA
heavydude2008
#208147048Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:48 AM GMT

QuantumSwag for House. Rep+ Yo, I'm new to this State. Much respect for giving me info about guns. The hood represent him.
evilPuck
#208147203Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:51 AM GMT

Support!
jakespider82
#208147261Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:51 AM GMT

I support you!
Miniaturemrawsome344
#208147372Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:53 AM GMT

You definitely have the qualifications. I mean, Head of TSA? Support
Stxel
#208147677Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:57 AM GMT

We have had our ups and downs with you on TRC but i think you would be a good HoR #Support - IllusionDreams [ TRC / Rockport Veteran Joined 8/4/11 ]
SourcedInfinity
#208225816Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:57 AM GMT

Quantum wants to ban C/PoT citizens? C/PoT is a meaningless title, I get that. But the fact that you are willing to ban C/PoT is just ridiculous. I'm working hard to get a meaning towards C/PoT, as I will present 3 new bills this term. But, still. Banning C/PoT citizens are ridiculous. C/PoT citizens are sometimes very active in the cities and I respect that. TSA teams to Oxford and Lakeshore without proper technology towards TSA will be useless. Just the inactivity towards those cities aren't going to work. Our legislation is delayed until V6 finishes. We already have voices from Rockport in TRC, as many government officials are Superintendents in the force. Besides, our constitution already limits us from controlling TRC. I do not see a benefit (or solution to current issues) from these legislation ideas. Signed, Representative SourcedInfinity.
Quantum_Falcon
#208234437Thursday, January 26, 2017 2:40 AM GMT

@SourcedInfinity - On C/PoT, that was the only idea that I came up with that I thought could work. If you have better ideas, I'm all ears. - On TSA, adding the proper technology is implied. - On TRC, Superintendents don't have any weight over TRC operations (correct me if wrong). HC+ does and that's where I'm looking for representation.
LordKarats
#208266025Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:39 PM GMT

Quantum You've got my official support and endorsement. Me joining this group myself around mid-2014 and being around for the initial establishment know that you've been a good citizen and served this state well in Congress and I think you'll do the same now. Rockport Senator, LordKarts. Docklands UCC || Norfolk UCC || Firestone UCC || USSF Captain || USSF Captain || Pinewood Dev
birdhunter47
#208296495Thursday, January 26, 2017 11:32 PM GMT

#Support
Twentiez
#208304201Friday, January 27, 2017 1:34 AM GMT

Support
NoobletNub
#208311528Friday, January 27, 2017 3:09 AM GMT

if im not mistaken, C/POT means AOS. uh "Rockport some voice in TRC" is not happening, simple as that. we tried to do it on the other side with the trc rep, didn't work. develoepr oversight will have next to no power, there's only one members known as mario, who is a nub. airports haven't been used in a while, we don't have a use for them. antidotes rdy

    of     1