of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

StrawberryMilks
#20828209Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:45 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
tovtov4
#20828278Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:47 PM GMT

gun eancarge cirme. if you role away to power of th epolice be sure that people will aim a gun to your head.
StrawberryMilks
#20828332Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:48 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
tovtov4
#20829043Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:00 PM GMT

no i would talk my way throught. i want to ask you this could it be that a guy point a gun to my head becosue he is not afried of the police?
FaffyxD
#20829762Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:13 PM GMT

No, I don't want to be a murderer, and when I was in karate clases the teacher taught us how to defend ourselves >_>
StrawberryMilks
#20829830Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:14 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
tovtov4
#20830536Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:26 PM GMT

1. You intend on killing yourself after your killing spree. thousand of people are killnig them self after a crime? no it a vary small number that it is vary hard to defande agaisnt. ------------------------- 2. You have a plane ready to go to Paraguay once again you think you are better then the police. beside few are the people who are doing this. after a person kill another he want to earn from what he did. and it hard to earn from killing another while you are in the other side of the world. --------------------------------- 3. They won't catch you. becouse you role away the police power. ---------------------------- 4. You have a terminal illness those people are few. --------------------------- Anyways the guy just killed you. You are now dead because words don't always work. if that was the case then: why would haveing a gun help me when he point a gun to my head? if a person want to rope me let him take my money i have inssurance. if a person want revange then i probly desarve my punishment. --------------------------
soraroxas2346
#20830969Wednesday, February 10, 2010 8:34 PM GMT

You only can brandish a gun if you have a perminant liscence if you were 18+ in some states of the US of A....
Carbonwing
#20835096Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:52 PM GMT

I would shoot him in his hand to disable him.
Hihibob
#20836716Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:19 PM GMT

I would blow a bullet through his head. It's "legal" if you attack someone in self defense especially if they have a gun.
Twigs180
#20837760Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:33 PM GMT

I would shoot him in the leg, hold him down, and dial 9-1-1.
Creatant
#20851465Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:46 AM GMT

The amendment that states we are allowed to carry arms is percieved differently. For example, some people just think it means they have the right to carry a gun. period. On the other hand, this was made back where the weaponry was far less advanced. So, they think it may mean you have the right to carry knives and a hunting rifle instead of all types of weaponry. There's been debating going on and on, but they aren't removing that amendment in the U.S.
Dharma3
#20852783Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:04 AM GMT

What if a guy pulls a knife on you. What then? Your gonna pull out another knife? Then it would be 50/50 Just because you make guns illegal doesn't mean criminals aren't gonna find ways to get them. *cough* mexico
Creatant
#20852895Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:06 AM GMT

Exactly... That what happened with the amendment that banned alcohol. There was too much illegal trading and smuggling, they just decided to repeal it.
tovtov4
#20870636Thursday, February 11, 2010 5:25 PM GMT

You only can brandish a gun if you have a perminant liscence if you were 18+ in some states of the US of A.... and? ---------------- I would blow a bullet through his head. It's "legal" if you attack someone in self defense especially if they have a gun. so becosue it ligal it mean it is moral? ------------------------- Just because you make guns illegal doesn't mean criminals aren't gonna find ways to get them. *cough* mexico im not saying that people are not going to use them but if guns are all around me what way do i have to stop the useges of them? civilians dont need to take the law to thier own hands.
eevee400
#20877368Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:21 PM GMT

The only way someone would be pointing a gun at you is because they could just stroll in any random shop in the US and buy one. In America, you can buy guns INSTANLY on E-bay. That's what the "Virginia Tech shooter" did. Then Americans overreacted because he was from Korea. It's best not to let civillians carry around guns.
StrawberryMilks
#20882711Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:54 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
XieXie
#20892548Friday, February 12, 2010 12:24 AM GMT

The problem with the anti-gun argument is that they revolve around the premise that guns encourage crime; which is an absurd statement. You do not punish the weapon for the crime, you punish the shooter. People who are for gun control see guns almost as an independent, sentient being. They believe that guns literally "control" the holder, and as such, "force" them to crime. I know it's clichéed, but guns don't kill people -- people kill people. You get rid of guns, you get something else. When you take the argument of deaths into gun crimes, you have to keep in mind that in the US, the statistics are as follows: In 1999, 58% of all gun deaths were suicides, and 38% were homicides. Ho.micide (Per 100,000) 3.98 S.ui.cid.e 5.92 Accidents/Other 0.36 [Data taken from Cukier and Sidel (2006) The Global Gun Epidemic. Praeger Security International. Westport.] Chris Oats, an article writer, puts it like this: In 1911 Turkey established gun control. Subsequently, from 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, deprived of the means to defend themselves, were rounded up and killed. In 1929 the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million dissidents were arrested and executed. In 1938 Germany established gun control. From 1939 to 1945 over 13 million Jews, gypsies, ho.mose.xuals, mentally ill, union leaders, Catholics and others, unable to fire a shot in protest, were killed by the state. In 1935 China established gun control. Between 1948 and 1952, over 20 million dissidents were rounded up and murdered by the Communists. In 1956 Cambodia enshrined gun control. In just two years (1975-1977) over one million "educated" people (about 1/3 of the entire population!) were executed by the Reds. In 1964 Guatemala locked in gun control. From 1964 to 1981 over 100,000 Mayan Indians were rounded up and killed, unable to defend themselves. In 1970 the Ugandan dictator decreed gun control. During the next nine years over 300,000 Christians were murdered. Over 56 million people have died, unable to defend themselves, because of gun control in the last century alone. So much for keeping our guns if we register them. On the other hand, lenient gun laws mean less crime. In Switzerland, all males from the ages of 20 to 42 are required to have guns. The Swiss have almost no murders and a very low crime rate! Some people say that the police are our protection therefore, we don't need guns. Here is where basic math comes into play. There are 271,933,702 people living in the United States. Currently, there are about 150,000 police officers on duty at any one time. This is on-duty police. This includes desk clerks, command sergeants, etc. - far fewer than 150,000 cops are cruising your neighborhood. Thus there is only one on-duty cop for every 1,813 citizens! _____ And that is why I'm pro-gun.
iplay
#20893020Friday, February 12, 2010 12:30 AM GMT

Very well done post, XieXie.
XieXie
#20893799Friday, February 12, 2010 12:42 AM GMT

Thank you. They're "medium-rare" to come by! Meat joke. Haha.
Twigs180
#20894444Friday, February 12, 2010 12:53 AM GMT

Very very very intellegent post. I would also like to mention the fact that Mexico has gun controll laws yet the drug cartel's are stilling killing innocent civillians they deem as a threat to their buisness. If you armed the civilians they would be able to fight back!
TowerBaker
#20895896Friday, February 12, 2010 1:16 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
homer544
#20915954Friday, February 12, 2010 2:29 PM GMT

Do not shoot the guy if he is about to shoot you. Just beat them up or get a phone and call 911.Its not illegal to hurt someone about to shoot you.
Creatant
#20916983Friday, February 12, 2010 3:08 PM GMT

Actually it is here... If you injure them while they are pointing a gun at you, you can be arrested for assault... I know, it's not very fair.
StrawberryMilks
#20927933Friday, February 12, 2010 8:09 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]

    of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right