|
1). Rektus seems more capable of leading and managing more groups, NAK specifically, than Vaktus can.
2). Rektus is literally more active than Vaktus.
3). VAKs HRs = Less active, too dumb | NAKs HRs = Active, very intelligent
4). NAK doesn't beg for raids like VAK does.
5). VAK is just too overrated and inactive...giving NAK a farmore greater advantage of dominating over them. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
NAK will not dominate, believe me.
When VE & AA tried to raid NAK you couldn't defend.
VAK will ALWAYS defend.
|
|
|
VAK will raid or defend anybody just to prove they are still above everyone else.
VAKs a joke, no matter what they do NOW. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
Then how will NAK ever be better than VAK, explain..
|
|
spongixonJoin Date: 2010-05-13
Post Count: 14753 |
are you dumb
|
|
AcrollaJoin Date: 2014-04-14
Post Count: 2882 |
kid you're a idiot. rektus cheats, he lies.. |
|
IntricalJoin Date: 2016-02-20
Post Count: 868 |
LOL.
I can't even tell if this is bait or not.
Kid, VAK will ALWAYS be better than NAK...lmao... |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
Khad, how am I an idiot if I believe in someone who's actually able to win without calling autowins? Huh?
And do you have any proof of NAK cheating?
|
|
|
VAK has good tech, but not good activity- unless they raid.
Half of their HRs are trash, and most don't even know what they're doing.
VAK thinks they are still above you, they aren't- not even close.
VAK is dead already, so stop saying they are still good.
Defending/Raiding won't determine that. What you do with your group, how it operates, determines your advantage. And NAK seems to be doing great, even if their leader is trash to you. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
VAk has better activity than NAK.
Just stop.
I'm in NAK myself yet NAK is nothing compared to VAK.
|
|
|
|
the leader doesnt have to be active to run a group well
|
|
|
(Like VAK doesn't cheat in raids, lol. Come on) |
|
IntricalJoin Date: 2016-02-20
Post Count: 868 |
NAK is bad.
Stop. |
|
IntricalJoin Date: 2016-02-20
Post Count: 868 |
I don't like VAK at all, but when someone says "NAK is better than ______!" I'm gonna step in
|
|
|
|
|
Did it ever occur to anyone, and you Vakkies out there, that VAK is no longer relevant on here anymore, even if they are still defending?
And with that, they can't possibly be better than NAK is.
Maybe back then, before NAK, VAK was so powerful, but not anymore. |
|
AcrollaJoin Date: 2014-04-14
Post Count: 2882 |
VAK is way more relevant than NAK, NAK's relevancy is purely negative. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
NAK is betetr than NHU tho.
Lmfao.
This thread overall has to be a joke though.
|
|
|
just stop already
your going to make me laugh |
|
AcrollaJoin Date: 2014-04-14
Post Count: 2882 |
>NAK cheats
>then is the best clan on this website. |
|
|
If VAK was no longer relevant, then why is it everytime someone says the word "VAK" on forums, everyone responds or it gets a lot of views? |
|
|
VAK should war NAK then.
(Btw I'm not even in NAK, but they are pretty relevant, more than VAK is, negative or not) |
|
ZerkiusJoin Date: 2015-05-17
Post Count: 3538 |
VAK can rally like 80
NAK can rally like 30 at most |
|