of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Xegic
#214040574Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:07 AM GMT

I feel like gun fighters see themselves as secondary school kids and us the primary school ones Imma destroy some points before anyone replies 1) Easy to make/bad technology - Many sword clans have good technology and do sword fighting because they like doing it. 2) It's easy to sword fight - A lot of gun groups would fail at the feet of sword groups. A lot of sword groups would do twice as bad in guns, but they're many talented sword groups. I know It's C&G but yo, be real.
BardPatriot
#214040635Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:08 AM GMT

Didnt know gun fighting was smaller then sword fighting? lol Imbressivley Imbressive
Xegic
#214040789Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:11 AM GMT

Gun fighting is more popular but In the threads/forums It seems like gun groups/members are always shunning the sword C&G community
Horrification
#214040791Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:11 AM GMT

dont worry gun fighters not all of us are like this spooky scary lego man
Xegic
#214041173Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:17 AM GMT

Just because I'm a low postie lol.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#214041205Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:18 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Xegic
#214043719Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:06 AM GMT

I've been a gunfighter since 2012. I beg to differ.
BIoodPatriot
#214043773Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:07 AM GMT

"1) Easy to make/bad technology - Many sword clans have good technology and do sword fighting because they like doing it." *inserts linked sword and recycled tech from 2012 sword clans into baseplate* GUYS I DID IT
instaskills
#214043844Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:08 AM GMT

can you give some examples of a sword clan with good tech?
zman250
#214043937Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:10 AM GMT

a lot of sword clans keep their forts relatively simple to avoid lag and create a fun experience for everyone sword clans generally tend to be a lot less toxic but on the other hand there are a lot more gun clans i think it's fun to be in both
instaskills
#214044071Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:13 AM GMT

yeah i understand that point. not bashing sword clans but i've also not seen any ground breaking sword clans.
zman250
#214044170Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:15 AM GMT

maybe not ground-breaking NFC fort topixa ii as pretty advanced for sword clans but again an issue there was lag
Astronexus
#214044591Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:24 AM GMT

"sword clans generally tend to be a lot less toxic but on the other hand there are a lot more gun clans" god no, i decided to delve into the community today for a defense and a raid and i can tell you the flame, toxicity, and crying from HiCOM on both sides is as bad if not worse than the gun community members only | very rare
Aviatrus
#214044598Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:24 AM GMT

sword clans are just as toxic Case Closed | +28k posts | +500k Value
Astronexus
#214044616Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:25 AM GMT

the thing is theres no room for innovation in the sword clan community, people refuse to move from the linked sword and simple terminal bases members only | very rare
zman250
#214044677Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:26 AM GMT

"god no, i decided to delve into the community today for a defense and a raid and i can tell you the flame, toxicity, and crying from HiCOM on both sides is as bad if not worse than the gun community" _ i mean that's a bad scenario but from someone that's been in both sword and gun clans for the past six years i can testify that the sword community has generally been the less toxic of the two
LordIntense
#214044717Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:27 AM GMT

gun clans always used to raid sword clans in like 2012-2014 idk what happened to that im pretty sure people just always preferred raiding guns
19_08
#214044734Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:28 AM GMT

SF clans would rather end up in an AW then a void :').
fourpapa1
#214044782Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:29 AM GMT

They all feel the same to me. If you've seen one, you've seen them all. I think strategy is less relied upon when swordfighting compared to gunfighting, and numbers are more important with the former. I don't like the argument "1v1 any elite gunfighter, you'll lose", though, because if you dueled a good swordfighter, chances are you'd lose too. There's more to it than holding W and clicking, like there is more to gunfighting than holding spacebar and clicking. Overall, I think it's quite bland.
LordIntense
#214044863Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:30 AM GMT

and sfing is just not enjoyable too many people its majority all ft and defenses have to be the almost same amount as raiders
zman250
#214044946Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:32 AM GMT

lordintense responding with intelligent posts in the dark hours of the night :thinking:
Randomletterspam
#214044951Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:32 AM GMT

Alright this debate is getting annoying im going to put my reason to switching out of swords and only helping one sword clan now. 1. Tech will not be as innovative as guns until sword fighters accept change Yes I know guns don't have a lot of innovation for now but they can accept it wACE for example and before you say swords can accept change MANY sword fighters still use OA and claim it is superior, swords cannot be changed in style whereas guns can have FPS, rifles etc if sword fighters accept a animation style to sword fighting and add effects like parrying then that would be cool. 2. Idkw but sword fighters seem to be open to paying for booters and such ?? ive seen much more exploiters and just general sketchy stuff in the sword community 3. idc i got bored writing this
xPrimus
#214044995Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:33 AM GMT

Gun Clans give us rating all the time, such as "Guns>Swords" or "Swords suck"
reblex6122
#214045074Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:35 AM GMT

because every single one is the same bland group with a generic trenchcoat uniform or space marine armor and a photoshop logo, no creativity or good tech at all.
xPrimus
#214049046Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:56 AM GMT

Okay because FEAR tech makes a Medivial based clan look so better

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right