Debate: (Impeachment of AmerIcanLaw
First off, the sections stated from 2C-2G were presented to me by witnesses who caught AmerIcanLaw causing trouble. For example: An FSP sergeant reported to me that AmerIcanLaw was evading multiple times; evidence of this action as stated in section 2D is where you can see that a “BOLO’ was placed on AmerIcanLaw due to him evading.
As stated in section 2G, you can see that AmerIcanLaw is being detained after logging. This screenshot was presented to me by a secret service agent who caught him in the act.
Now, you can see that in section 2F, AmerIcanLaw was failing to present identification to an FSP Corporal during a traffic stop. AmerIcanLaw chose to be unruly and not present identification to the FSP Corporal when required to. And no, he doesn’t have to answer questions, but he’s still required to present his identification in a traffic stop,
Lastly, I would highly suggest to vote “aye” for the removal of DCJ, AmerIcanLaw. Since that we cannot not have officials going around to causing trouble on the streets and expect to get away with it...
I yield.
|