if it's a war of endurance why even bother fighting

Weaponizing

Join Date: 2013-01-09
Post Count: 4135

#216492427Friday, May 12, 2017 9:07 PM GMT

fighting doesn't matter if a victory means nothing

kroxon

Join Date: 2012-03-24
Post Count: 6600

#216492617Friday, May 12, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

What are you on about

HateHouse

Join Date: 2013-08-27
Post Count: 8815

#216492630Friday, May 12, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

Correct.

Weaponizing

Join Date: 2013-01-09
Post Count: 4135

#216492717Friday, May 12, 2017 9:12 PM GMT

What are you on about --- csp vak nonsense victories at varcia or whatever don't matter well they'd matter for vak if vak somehow managed to pull a giant lead in wins at varcia so that they could claim autowin when they got tired even though it was "endurance"

TheDarkVaraug

Join Date: 2010-08-23
Post Count: 14685

#216492895Friday, May 12, 2017 9:14 PM GMT

Let's see why endurance is still great. Let's say the hype of the war and someone potentially beating VAK powers CSP to a 30-10 advantage in the first month. You move onto the second month, hype has died down, and the war has started to even out. It's now 50-40 in CSPs favor. Let's go into month three, CSP has gotten bored and moved on, and VAK has taken advantage. It's now 70-60 in VAKs favor. Endurance offers this for wars: A more realistic view on war. Wars aren't meant to last three days with a win limit, you fight until someone gives in. A longer war, 30 wins can be achieved in a few weeks if you work at it. An endurance war can go on for months. A chance for anyone to win. Let's say VAK gets 100 wins, and CSP gets 15, CSP can still win if they never gave up, as VAK would have to get bored eventually. It's actually more fair and more fun. TheDarkVaraug, Evan || Add 23,771 Posts

Weaponizing

Join Date: 2013-01-09
Post Count: 4135

#216493081Friday, May 12, 2017 9:17 PM GMT

yea but endurance wars never work out between stubborn tryhard clans because there isn't an actual win condition

Moist_God

Join Date: 2016-12-05
Post Count: 582

#216493105Friday, May 12, 2017 9:17 PM GMT

Wars on the blox are a measure of skill, which clan is better than the other. We obviously proved we were better by our great win ratio at both defending and raiding. VAK would never challenge us in a war that is set on who will get the most wins, they're bad and they know it. This is why they want an endurance war, they can't beat us by winning, so they decided to make the war terms themselves without negotiations, this is more like a challenge, not like a war.

c4spian

Join Date: 2010-07-09
Post Count: 12562

#216493163Friday, May 12, 2017 9:18 PM GMT

assassin_lord

Join Date: 2010-10-23
Post Count: 10926

#216493367Friday, May 12, 2017 9:21 PM GMT

evan the correct way to do that type of war is a "whoever has x amount of wins over other clan" meaning, just a random scenario, jc has to get 50 MORE wins than rat has 50-0 would win the war, 51-1 would win the war, 51-2 the war is still ongoing. this makes it so a clan has to either surrender and admit they're beat when its clear they lost or the other clan has to get an overwhelming amount of victories to declare a win. that is an example of how clan wars USED to be, only there was never an agreed number clans just declared victory when it was obvious they won (and there were still tons of arguments over it in most cases but that's how it always is). the way vak wants to do an endurance wars is just wrong and terrible. it's a war that never ends until one side is fed up with another and rq's because of cheating or tries to autowin. not even gonna go into detail on why using ### ##### ##### ##### is stupid.