of     1   

zach7tbb
#219389776Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:54 PM GMT

[Overview] This game was very lopsided - the problem was clear, Villanova has the defense, they have the shooters, they don't have a PG. Notre Dame struggled with turnovers and inbounding, also finishing shots, but they were able to pull through abusing the clear disadvantage: Villanova's point guard problem. [Villanova] ########### played great defense, he has a future as a top zone defender. He was able to create multiple turnovers and lockdown Notre Dame's point guard for consecutive plays. It's clear what Villanova's strong point is - defense. When Villanova can't force turnovers they cannot score and that's a huge issue. Villanova's defense relies on it's front lines to create a turnover, if the PG gets rid of the ball, their defense breaks down and they fall apart. On offense they must've went through ### ##### guards, they struggled to pass the ball, the point kept losing the ball immediately. It sucks, because I know they have some good shooters - MinorHenryFruit and barrysanders are good spot up shooters but were contained because of the guard's lack of ball movement. [Notre Dame] Notre Dame has solid hash players, they ran their offense through eatmygroceries who abused his defender at the hash. He made some great moves to get around the defender and finish tough shots. Eat finished with ### ####### MidRangers was second with 28, despite some embarrassing missed shots, he played well and made some shots. On defense, eat single handedly forced nearly 15 turnovers - the team as a whole forced 27 turnovers and took advantage of the lack of PG on Nova. [PLAYER OF THE GAME] eatmygroceries [ND] - ## ##### ##### ###### STL [TOP PERFORMER ON THE LOSING TEAM] ########### [NOVA] - ## ##### ###### STL

    of     1