Charge 49 cents to create an account.

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221576080Monday, July 17, 2017 6:39 AM GMT

Botting accounts would be severely downsized because of the overwhelming 50 cent fees. Also, 49 cents is little to pay for a single account, because generally you only need one account. Or you could charge after the first account, but IP swapping is an issue. This would still slow down the botting process since it's very resource intensive to change IPs every account created.

Rebned

Join Date: 2013-03-20
Post Count: 1712

#221577595Monday, July 17, 2017 7:12 AM GMT

I do not support. Of course it'd reduce the spam, but the problem is that it would also reduce the community. There are many small children who play ROBLOX, and if there was such fee, they'd have to ask their parents to pay with ###### ################## There are some parents who avoid paying with ###### ################# online or do not trust ROBLOX with their money. Therefore, many kids won't be able to play ROBLOX. Even if the fee is just for the second account and beyond, I believe my argument still fits. There are houses with a few children.

TheBucketThief

Join Date: 2013-07-01
Post Count: 8909

#221577681Monday, July 17, 2017 7:14 AM GMT

then "ROBLOX: It's Free!" will no longer be a true statement

tylorfoot6000

Join Date: 2011-12-02
Post Count: 246

#221578854Monday, July 17, 2017 7:38 AM GMT

support it would #### out the nooby bacon hairs but what about the people who already signed up

iEggvertisement

Join Date: 2014-04-16
Post Count: 38

#221578888Monday, July 17, 2017 7:39 AM GMT

I actually kinda like this idea. It'd stop hitting altogether, and it'd minimize the user count, thus saving ROBLOX a TON of money which they can then do things such as hire more mods, bring back older updates, etc.

iEggvertisement

Join Date: 2014-04-16
Post Count: 38

#221578913Monday, July 17, 2017 7:40 AM GMT

Botting* not hitting - stupid autocorrect.

JushBJJ2

Join Date: 2015-09-23
Post Count: 3901

#221579981Monday, July 17, 2017 8:07 AM GMT

yeAH LETS STOP KIDS FROM PLAYING LOL

MICHAEL936

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221935997Friday, July 21, 2017 8:08 AM GMT

49 cents is nothing in small amounts. This should curb botting and still be okay with parents. The kids can show their parents ROBLOX and they should then start seeing that this is a legitimate company.

helloburp

Join Date: 2011-08-26
Post Count: 14376

#221936155Friday, July 21, 2017 8:11 AM GMT

ROBLOX: IT'S 50 CENTS!

rend00

Join Date: 2013-10-02
Post Count: 760

#221936222Friday, July 21, 2017 8:12 AM GMT

So make ROBLOX pay to play and freemium?

MICHAEL936

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221936651Friday, July 21, 2017 8:22 AM GMT

I need a legitimate reason why this couldn't be a thing. Everyone with access to ROBLOX most likely can pay 49 cents, and if not the second account idea still stands.

helloburp

Join Date: 2011-08-26
Post Count: 14376

#221937238Friday, July 21, 2017 8:36 AM GMT

some kids' parents are opposed to paying for anything online and thus those little kids might not enjoy roblox (and thus not view the ads) as much as they could

MICHAEL936

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221937316Friday, July 21, 2017 8:38 AM GMT

The parents who are opposed to paying for anything online aren't going to last much longer. See Amazon. Also, it's not that hard to get a ###### for the "suspicious" parents or set up your kid his/her own bank account.

MICHAEL936

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221937334Friday, July 21, 2017 8:38 AM GMT

Fantastic, P-yPal is filtered.

MICHAEL936

Join Date: 2009-10-10
Post Count: 5086

#221937376Friday, July 21, 2017 8:39 AM GMT

Also, this doesn't mean that you can't use a Guest account... The whole purpose of a Guest account is a playtest anyways. Could demo this to your parents, and then perhaps show them the many benefits of purchasing a full account.