of     1   

Gunnar_S
#221933593Friday, July 21, 2017 7:08 AM GMT

To begin, I for one am creative enough where this feature wouldn't be of use to me. I think it is safe to say that hundreds of group are created each month, and that the basis of names is beginning to lack in decency. Allowing for the creation of groups with the same name would free up the names of those used groups which have zero members and are closed for public access. "But people will copy off of the glory of other groups!" They do that anyways. I mean, there is like 10+ The Seven Kingdoms which have literally the same name, but with invisible characters. So that original TSK, the one without awful invisible characters that ruin your group page, is sitting dead with an inactive leader. Not having this feature will not stop people from copying groups. If I wanted to, I could go ahead and start another TRA. Example: The Robloxian Army Atleast with this feature it would look decent. Now, obviously this would mess up the system with Allies / Enemies tab, but that would be an easy fix. I propose that a system such as the one used by Clash of Clans be put into place. Each group would receive a code found in the big letters near the Group Admin tab. Example: #123456123456. This code would be the code used to send and accept allies and to declare enemies. That being said, anyone would have access to names like United States. Example: United States #12345 United States #34154 Pretty much it gets rid of crap groups and allows other people to create groups where others have failed. The End.
FPSPwnz0r
#221933626Friday, July 21, 2017 7:09 AM GMT

ye support R$1
VOKZ3L
#221933728Friday, July 21, 2017 7:11 AM GMT

1. Imagine two groups with the same name and the same member count. 2. Think of a more unique name than "The Robloxian Army". That is so generic. Think for more than 2 seconds for a name. ME LLAMO JEFF
Gunnar_S
#221933812Friday, July 21, 2017 7:13 AM GMT

Read what I said at the top.
VOKZ3L
#221933912Friday, July 21, 2017 7:15 AM GMT

Actually, lol now that I think about it I support it... but still robloxian army is incredibly generic ME LLAMO JEFF
Gunnar_S
#221969285Friday, July 21, 2017 7:11 PM GMT

Yeah, I agree. I was only using it as an example.

    of     1