cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
"Voting - Determining what is liked and what's not."
That is my defenition of voting. Now let's see how Contests puts this.
"Voting - Determining what is liked and what is not, while having points to make liked possibilities go higher."
That doesn't seem to bad, does it? But it is. Ever watched the science channel? They teach mice not to do things, basically, make them learn. They do this by giving them something bad when not doing what scientists want, and something good when they do something scientists DO want. Humans are like this too. Taking away Voting Accuracy is somethign we don't like. Adding it is something we do like. So we vote for the places that give us accuracy, not the places that we like. You see the problem now. Big problem now, right?
Accurate means to be correct, or exact. Voting cannot be correct. Voting Accuracy is saying Voting Correctness. Voting, is, Determining what is liked and what is not. Opinions cannot be correct. So, you might of guessed already, my suggestion is to remove Voting Accuracy. It would make the people who worked hard on their place to be rewarded, instead of getting nothing. Simple as that. Remove Voting Accuracy and this will be fixed, contests will be more fun.
Thanks for reading this over-ten-line post. Choose what you think is right. If you don't understand, read again, slowly. |
|
McPwnageJoin Date: 2009-04-03
Post Count: 632 |
I just looked at the importent things. THE END! xD jk cy, those are good. :o |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
Do people just not want to read it? Because short ideas don't provide much information. Most of my ideas aren't really disapproved, but aren't posted on. |
|
|
I agree, I wasnt able to vote in the last contest because of all the freemodel places. For example: There was to places One was a baseplate the other was A very good game. I obviously click the good one but i get -5?! I was like HOW!? |
|
McPwnageJoin Date: 2009-04-03
Post Count: 632 |
Agreed.. I pick a place that's on topic, BOOM! -4! What is that? |
|
regsaJoin Date: 2008-09-12
Post Count: 309 |
A G R E E D |
|
willyoJoin Date: 2008-01-15
Post Count: 421 |
I sort of agree because it's really anoying to pick the better place and not get more voting accuracy so yes i agree |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
61 views, 5 posts not made by me. Are so many people too lazy to read? |
|
|
Amazing idea. But you got one thing wrong. People dont like accuracy, people like prizes. So we just say, vote for 50 places, and you get a prize, so people will still vote, but they will vote fairly. :-D |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
And that does what? make them vote every place 1 star because it gives them a hat? |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
Wait, I got this mixed with another idea. |
|
|
have you ever looked at the highest rated places?? THEY ARE ALL THE SAME THING!!! removing voting accuracy mght solve this problem
i support |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
Do I have to advertise this for people to reply? |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
I ordered more posts, not more views. |
|
|
Here, have some post toast and a little support juice to go with it.
~Awright, who gave the zombie the TNT?~
~Before posting, read the forum rules, and read the POST. -_-~
|
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
I am not giving up on this idea. |
|
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
It's not that this idea is not supported, it's that people are too lazy too read it, so it doesn't get posted on and falls. |
|
OBFJoin Date: 2009-09-29
Post Count: 10709 |
Support. |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
I guess I'll have to finally call thise "Bump". |
|
cyrus1222Join Date: 2009-01-29
Post Count: 5141 |
Yay. No more posts. |
|
|
if its between a free modled place and a small normal place you would have voting accuracy taken away for voting for the normal place |
|
|
Support, but sadly, the admins wont change the voting system.
They're too lazy to. |
|