of     1   

mambo99
#33714521Monday, September 13, 2010 1:23 AM GMT

Instead of the traditional "The item you requested does not exist", I think you should be able to see the profile of a banned person. It allows easier access to their games. Instead: The user's account gets locked. (The user's em@il is swiped clean, then his/her pa$$word is changed to some random numbers for however long he/she is destined to be banned, say, 1 week.) After 1 week the person's account is unlocked. Then you have easy access to their games! Like clockwork, Dignity, fleskhjerta, SinisterAlex, Minish, Meelo, etc. Well what do you think? Discuss.
gothicsanctum
#33715242Monday, September 13, 2010 1:32 AM GMT

Heck yah...Good idea good idea...
Kevinyock
#33715543Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 AM GMT

Support
snakehunt
#33716788Monday, September 13, 2010 1:53 AM GMT

yea, like some people that have AWSHUM places...that i wanna play :D "But that was the past. Now you're nothing but a speck of dust to me"
dastuke
#33717725Monday, September 13, 2010 2:07 AM GMT

merry christmas, here are clockwork's place's links
dastuke
#33717907Monday, September 13, 2010 2:10 AM GMT

mambo99
#33742280Monday, September 13, 2010 9:03 PM GMT

Bump.
Arus51
#33742467Monday, September 13, 2010 9:05 PM GMT

Makes sense, it makes it harder to find their games, but you can play them anyway, so they might as well just make it easier.
jacob726
#33742517Monday, September 13, 2010 9:06 PM GMT

supported.
YouWinTheInternet
#33743217Monday, September 13, 2010 9:15 PM GMT

No support. One of the reasons you don't see banned people's profiles is because that way ROBLOX doesn't have to pay to have thier page up on the server. So banned people (the way it is now) probably saves ROBLOX about 200$ (REAL Dollars) per hour.
mambo99
#33743355Monday, September 13, 2010 9:17 PM GMT

@internet Roblox doesn't have to pay to keep a banned person's page up. If that was the case, they would have deleted a bunch of inactive users. And the thought of $200 an hour is ridiculous.
GeneralHolder
#33743427Monday, September 13, 2010 9:18 PM GMT

I support >_> ~GH~

    of     1