of     1   

ihavemanyaccounts
#38734533Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:03 AM GMT

face it,these directors cannot make a movie off of books and TV series,they never get the whole thing,there always leave out parts,and sometimes add some,its almost impossible to get it right -_-
gellick
#38743250Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:10 AM GMT

I object,if that is true explain holes
MCAdo
#38745641Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:29 AM GMT

Or Harry Pot- never mind.
RickRiordan
#38750061Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:08 PM GMT

Percy Jackson was way off.
gellick
#38761737Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:38 PM GMT

yea but it was still good
dragontermt
#38848663Friday, December 17, 2010 1:04 AM GMT

percy jackson the movie sucked
bolt999
#38850246Friday, December 17, 2010 1:20 AM GMT

That movie was........Disquesting
gellick
#38859497Friday, December 17, 2010 3:08 AM GMT

OK PERCY JACKSON APARTFROM THIS still explain holes?
CptWaffle
#38859825Friday, December 17, 2010 3:13 AM GMT

Eragon... *shivers*
Gagmaster1234
#38864532Friday, December 17, 2010 4:32 AM GMT

It gets them money. It gets the fans excited Once and a while, the peron who WROTE the book is the one who writes the script, making it the worlds most epic movie.. They change up the plot so people in the movie wont be like.. " Yeah.. they die, that person dies.. yeah " ===================== Again, it gets them ALOT of money of all the fans that WANT to see it..
FusionRex
#38865461Friday, December 17, 2010 4:55 AM GMT

Narnia went pretty well. I suppose.

    of     1