ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
As you may have noticed, ROBLOX contains a large and growing number of battle groups. Many plan "raids" on enemy groups, but usually these consist of going into an enemy base, yelling, and endlessly killing the few enemies that are actually there. These "raids" aren't very satisfying, and are usually short-lived: they can be stopped by shutting down the server or everyone just leaving.
I suggest the following system:
When two clans decide to fight, the leaders must agree on a place, a time, and the number of players.
Place- Clans can fight in one of their own bases/fighting grounds or choose from a selection of default maps.
Time- Self-explanatory
Number of Players- Teams must have equal players, leaders choose players. Max would be 10 per clan, as maximum allowed in a server is 20.
The leaders must decide on a type of warfare- Last Man Standing, CTF, King Of The Hill, or regular battle (Team with most KO's in a given amount of time.)
Each clan has a badge, and the winning clan gets the losing clan's badge.
The amount of badges each clan has is displayed on their page, as well as the number of times they have lost and had to yield their badge.
A leaderboard for best battle groups, with categories as follows:
Most Wins-(This Week, This Month, All-Time)
Highest Win-to-Lose Ratio-(This Week, This Month, All-Time)
Group with most wins at the end of the month gets some kind of reward. (Extra Building Place? Extra Ranks?)
Let me know what you think. If you have any suggestions, feel free to post.
|
|
|
but still if its 10 people only what if the leader of the clan is the leader of a super clan |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
The leader choses the 10 best fighters. (Leader does not necessarily have to participate.) |
|
|
what if the leader was in a super clan? |
|
MrCherrysJoin Date: 2010-04-28
Post Count: 13469 |
Nice idea you did. |
|
rowdie4Join Date: 2009-07-14
Post Count: 437 |
Wow, very good idea. Support! |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
@up
super clan? |
|
|
|
But i still support that way leaders of clans can't just put there enimes on there deafeted list. |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
The leaders could also decide how many battles to have, so they could change out players. |
|
|
true also there could be a system that rondomly picks ten people. |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
Bump. |
|
|
KTeddy13Join Date: 2010-07-02
Post Count: 1346 |
That would be cool. Supported. |
|
|
jojo2342Join Date: 2009-04-29
Post Count: 208 |
I have a great idea for this!!!!! Every one can just request to join one server with 20 players max and when some one dies they get banned so the next member can take his place. |
|
|
Unsupport.
I don't think clans need to dream more than they already do. |
|
flamorieJoin Date: 2009-02-04
Post Count: 8563 |
The problem is, you can't force people to take up time to fight. |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
The players wouldn't be forced.
As updownleft suggested, 10 online, available players could be chosen then requested to join the fight.
If they refuse, then another player would be chosen.
Another setting could be whether teams must have equal teams, or they can have any number from 10 down. |
|
flamorieJoin Date: 2009-02-04
Post Count: 8563 |
This design wouldn't work. They would need to to a lot more designing. This is a good idea, but too many things that could go wrong. |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
@flamorie
The design I put is just a suggestion that is meant to be changed to a possible option. |
|
MrEPIC10Join Date: 2010-10-17
Post Count: 699 |
EPIC SAUCEZ! :D |
|
|
Great idea! 100% Support! |
|
|
I'm gonna post this in C&G and see what they think.Don't worrry I'll give you all the credit |
|
ResurgetJoin Date: 2008-09-07
Post Count: 1882 |
bump
@updown
link please? |
|